IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v50y2023i2p624-654..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moral hazard in the British bovine tuberculosis control programme

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel P Scheitrum
  • K Aleks Schaefer
  • Steven van Winden

Abstract

Animal disease indemnity payments create a moral hazard problem by diminishing the financial burden of on-farm infection which, in turn, can reduce private incentives to invest in biosecurity. The economic importance of the moral hazard problem is a function of the size of the indemnity payment relative to market prices and input costs, as well as farm-specific disease risks and the probability that biosecurity efforts can reduce those risks. We investigate the importance of these contributory factors on disease outcomes in the context of the British bovine tuberculosis control programme using longitudinal herd-level data for all beef cattle herds in Great Britain. We show that, by disincentivising biosecurity investment, increases in disease indemnity payments lead to more on-farm breakdowns, increase the number of on-farm disease reactors and extend the duration of infection. Our findings suggest that the disease burden created through these unintended consequences accounts for approximately one-fourth of the additional programme outlays associated with a 10% increase in the per-head indemnity payment.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel P Scheitrum & K Aleks Schaefer & Steven van Winden, 2023. "Moral hazard in the British bovine tuberculosis control programme," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(2), pages 624-654.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:624-654.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/jbac027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:624-654.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.