IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v50y2023i2p201-231..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamics of demand-side and supply-side responses to front-of-pack nutrition labels: a narrative review

Author

Listed:
  • Elisa De Marchi
  • Alessia Cavaliere
  • Flavia Pucillo
  • Alessandro Banterle
  • Rodolfo M Nayga

Abstract

The European Union (EU) food market is characterised by the presence of several front-of-pack nutrition labels (FOPLs), some of which have only been introduced lately. While the EU Commission proposed to harmonise and possibly mandate the use of FOPLs, agreement on which label to adopt has not been reached. This review explores the main issues related to the adoption of FOPLs from both the demand-side and the supply-side perspective with the aim of providing an updated evidence-based road map for the development of future studies that can contribute to extend scientific evidence and guide future food policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisa De Marchi & Alessia Cavaliere & Flavia Pucillo & Alessandro Banterle & Rodolfo M Nayga, 2023. "Dynamics of demand-side and supply-side responses to front-of-pack nutrition labels: a narrative review," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(2), pages 201-231.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:201-231.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/jbac031
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:201-231.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.