IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v31y2007i4p507-524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does shareholder primacy lead to a decline in managerial accountability?

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine Rebérioux

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine Rebérioux, 2007. "Does shareholder primacy lead to a decline in managerial accountability?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 31(4), pages 507-524, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:31:y:2007:i:4:p:507-524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bem009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simon Deakin & Ajit Singh, 2009. "The Stock Market, the Market for Corporate Control and the Theory of the Firm: Legal and Economic Perspectives and Implications for Public Policy," Chapters, in: Per-Olof Bjuggren & Dennis C. Mueller (ed.), The Modern Firm, Corporate Governance and Investment, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Catherine Bodet & Thomas Lamarche, 2011. "Discours RSE, la réalité sociale décalée "Du rapport de développement durable au rapport CHSCT : tension sur l'expertise sociale dans l'entreprise"," Working Papers halshs-00865044, HAL.
    3. Catherine Bodet & Thomas Lamarche, 2013. "La RSE contribue-t-elle au développement durable ?," Working Papers halshs-00912728, HAL.
    4. Barbara D. Merino & Alan G. Mayper & Thomas D. Tolleson, 2010. "Neoliberalism, deregulation and Sarbanes‐Oxley," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(6), pages 774-792, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:31:y:2007:i:4:p:507-524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.