Post-socialist Financial Fragility: The Case of Albania
AbstractThe 1997 collapse of the Albanian economy caused by the collapse of economy-wide Ponzi schemes contrasts sharply to its success status as a post-Socialist transition country in the years 1992-96. In this paper, an attempt is made to explain this "Albanian Paradox". The specific Albanian conditions for the growth of Ponzi schemes are identified. Theoretically, the Albanian Paradox can be interpreted as one version of the "Financial Instability Hypothesis" suggested by Minsky. Investigation of the underlying factors that render financial markets fragile suggest that the Albanian case is extreme but not unique in the region. It is emphasised that sustainable growth is predicted on the quality of government, on proper financial-sector regulation, on actual microeconomic restructuring and on the development of market institutions through which adequate market information is disseminated. Copyright 2001 by Oxford University Press.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Oxford University Press in its journal Cambridge Journal of Economics.
Volume (Year): 25 (2001)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://www.cje.oupjournals.org/
Other versions of this item:
- Dirk J. Bezemer, 1999. "Post-Socialist Financial Fragility: the Case of Albania," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 99-045/2, Tinbergen Institute.
- E12 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian
- G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
- O5 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies
- P27 - Economic Systems - - Socialist Systems and Transition Economies - - - Performance and Prospects
- P34 - Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Finance
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Klarita Gërxhani & Arthur Schram, 2009. "Clientelism and polarized voting: empirical evidence," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 305-317, December.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.