IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v90y2003i1p73-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confidence regions when the Fisher information is zero

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo Bottai

Abstract

We examine the asymptotic behaviour of confidence regions in identifiable one-dimensional parametric models with smooth likelihood function and information equal to zero at a critical point of the parameter space. Confidence regions are based on inversion of the likelihood ratio test statistic and of some common forms of the score and Wald test statistics. For fixed parameter values other than the critical point, all these statistics have limiting x-super-2-sub-(1) distributions, but for most of them the convergence is not uniform near the critical point. When it is not, confidence regions based on inverting the tests, using the x-super-2-sub-(1) approximation, do not asymptotically have the nominal level. The exception to this lack of locally uniform convergence occurs with the score test standardised by expected, rather than observed, information. For the regions based on the score test standardised by observed information and on the likelihood ratio test, conservative procedures that do not rely on the x-super-2-sub-(1) approximation can be developed, but they are much too conservative near the critical parameter value. The regions based on the Wald tests have asymptotic level less than ½, regardless of the procedure used. Our results suggest that no procedure based solely on the likelihood function will be satisfactory. Whether or not this is the case is an open problem. A simulation study illustrates the results of this paper. Copyright Biometrika Trust 2003, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo Bottai, 2003. "Confidence regions when the Fisher information is zero," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(1), pages 73-84, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:90:y:2003:i:1:p:73-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dante Amengual & Xinyue Bei & Enrique Sentana, 2022. "Normal but skewed?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(7), pages 1295-1313, November.
    2. Grant Hillier & Giovanni Forchini, 2004. "Ill-posed Problems and Instruments' Weakness," Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings 357, Econometric Society.
    3. Kruiniger, Hugo, 2018. "A further look at Modified ML estimation of the panel AR(1) model with fixed effects and arbitrary initial conditions," MPRA Paper 88623, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Ley, Christophe & Paindaveine, Davy, 2010. "On the singularity of multivariate skew-symmetric models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(6), pages 1434-1444, July.
    5. Matteo Bottai & Nicola Orsini, 2004. "Confidence intervals for the variance component of random-effects linear models," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 4(4), pages 429-435, December.
    6. Hugo Kruiniger, 2023. "Large sample properties of GMM estimators under second-order identification," Papers 2307.13475, arXiv.org.
    7. Christophe Ley & Davy Paindaveine, 2010. "On Fisher information matrices and profile log-likelihood functions in generalized skew-elliptical models," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(3), pages 235-250.
    8. Centorrino, Samuele & Perez Urdiales, Mari­a & Bravo-Ureta, Boris & Wall, Alan, 2021. "Binary Endogenous Treatment in Stochastic Frontier Models with an Application to Soil Conservation in El Salvador," 95th Annual Conference, March 29-30, 2021, Warwick, UK (Hybrid) 312058, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    9. Matteo Bottai & Nicola Salvati & Nicola Orsini, 2006. "Multilevel models for analyzing people’s daily movement behavior," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 97-108, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:90:y:2003:i:1:p:73-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.