IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i3p588-596..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How dancing honey bees keep track of changes: the role of inspector bees

Author

Listed:
  • Boris Granovskiy
  • Tanya Latty
  • Michael Duncan
  • David J. T. Sumpter
  • Madeleine Beekman

Abstract

How do honey bees track changes in their foraging environment? Previously, 2 complementary mechanisms have been identified by which bees can effectively switch between food sources when their relative quality changes. First, an increase in profitability of a food source elicits an increase in waggle dances (the bees' recruitment mechanism) for that source. Second, bees that have retired from foraging at a food source make occasional inspection visits to that food source and resume foraging if its quality improves. Here, we investigate, using both field experiments and a mathematical model, the relative importance of these 2 mechanisms. By manipulating dance information available to the bees, we find that when food sources change quality frequently, inspector bees provide a rapid response to changes, whereas the waggle dance contributes to a response over a longer time period. The bees' ability to switch feeders without dance language information was found to be robust with respect to the spatial configuration of the feeders. Our results show that individual memory, in the form of inspector bees, and collective communication can interact to allow an insect colony to adapt to changes on both short and long timescales.

Suggested Citation

  • Boris Granovskiy & Tanya Latty & Michael Duncan & David J. T. Sumpter & Madeleine Beekman, 2012. "How dancing honey bees keep track of changes: the role of inspector bees," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 588-596.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:3:p:588-596.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madeleine Beekman & Jie Bin Lew, 2008. "Foraging in honeybees--when does it pay to dance?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(2), pages 255-261.
    2. Anna Dornhaus & Franziska Klügl & Christoph Oechslein & Frank Puppe & Lars Chittka, 2006. "Benefits of recruitment in honey bees: effects of ecology and colony size in an individual-based model," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(3), pages 336-344, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Byron N. Van Nest & Darrell Moore, 2012. "Energetically optimal foraging strategy is emergent property of time-keeping behavior in honey bees," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 649-658.
    2. Dyer, A.G. & Dorin, A. & Reinhardt, V. & Garcia, J.E. & Rosa, M.G.P., 2014. "Bee reverse-learning behavior and intra-colony differences: Simulations based on behavioral experiments reveal benefits of diversity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 277(C), pages 119-131.
    3. Anna Dornhaus, 2011. "Finding optimal collective strategies using individual-based simulations: colony organization in social insects," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 25-37, May.
    4. Tsvetomira Radeva & Anna Dornhaus & Nancy Lynch & Radhika Nagpal & Hsin-Hao Su, 2017. "Costs of task allocation with local feedback: Effects of colony size and extra workers in social insects and other multi-agent systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-29, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:3:p:588-596.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.