IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v277y2014icp119-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bee reverse-learning behavior and intra-colony differences: Simulations based on behavioral experiments reveal benefits of diversity

Author

Listed:
  • Dyer, A.G.
  • Dorin, A.
  • Reinhardt, V.
  • Garcia, J.E.
  • Rosa, M.G.P.

Abstract

Foraging bees use color cues to help identify rewarding from unrewarding flowers. As environmental conditions change, bees may require behavioral flexibility to reverse their learnt preferences. Learning to discriminate perceptually similar colors takes bees a long time, and thus potentially poses a difficult task to reverse-learn. We trained free-flying honeybees to learn a fine color discrimination task that could only be resolved (with about 70% accuracy) following extended differential conditioning. The bees were then tested for their ability to reverse-learn this visual problem. Subsequent analyses potentially identified individual behavioral differences that could be broadly classified as: ‘Deliberative-decisive’ bees that could, after several flower visits, decisively make a large change to learnt preferences; ‘Fickle-circumspect’ bees that changed their preferences by a small amount every time they received a reward, or failed to receive one, on a particular color; and ‘Stay’ bees that did not change from their initially learnt preference. To understand the ecological implications of the observed behavioral diversity, agent-based computer simulations were conducted by systematically varying parameters describing flower reward switch oscillation frequency, flower handling time, and fraction of defective ‘target’ stimuli that contained no reward. These simulations revealed that when the frequency of reward reversals is high, Fickle-circumspect bees are more efficient at nectar collection, but as reward reversal frequency decreases, the performance of Deliberative-decisive bees becomes most efficient. As the reversal frequency continues to fall, Fickle-circumspect and Deliberative-decisive strategies approach one another in efficiency. In no tested condition did Stay bees outperform the other groups. These findings indicate there is a fitness benefit for honeybee colonies containing individuals exhibiting different strategies for managing changing resource conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dyer, A.G. & Dorin, A. & Reinhardt, V. & Garcia, J.E. & Rosa, M.G.P., 2014. "Bee reverse-learning behavior and intra-colony differences: Simulations based on behavioral experiments reveal benefits of diversity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 277(C), pages 119-131.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:277:y:2014:i:c:p:119-131
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.01.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438001400043X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.01.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lars Chittka & Adrian G. Dyer & Fiola Bock & Anna Dornhaus, 2003. "Bees trade off foraging speed for accuracy," Nature, Nature, vol. 424(6947), pages 388-388, July.
    2. Anna Dornhaus & Franziska Klügl & Christoph Oechslein & Frank Puppe & Lars Chittka, 2006. "Benefits of recruitment in honey bees: effects of ecology and colony size in an individual-based model," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(3), pages 336-344, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rachel Arnon & Tamar Keasar & Dan Cohen & Avi Shmida, 2006. "Vertical Orientation and Color Contrast and Choices by Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris L.)," Levine's Bibliography 321307000000000608, UCLA Department of Economics.
    2. Rachel Arnon & Tamar Keasar & Dan Cohen & Avi Shmida, 2006. "Vertical Orientation and Color Contrast and Choices by Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris L.)," Discussion Paper Series dp439, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    3. Elva J H Robinson & Nigel R Franks & Samuel Ellis & Saki Okuda & James A R Marshall, 2011. "A Simple Threshold Rule Is Sufficient to Explain Sophisticated Collective Decision-Making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-11, May.
    4. Peter Cassey & Andrew Heathcote & Scott D Brown, 2014. "Brain and Behavior in Decision-Making," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-8, July.
    5. Barbara Casillas-Pérez & Katarína Boďová & Anna V. Grasse & Gašper Tkačik & Sylvia Cremer, 2023. "Dynamic pathogen detection and social feedback shape collective hygiene in ants," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Filip Gesiarz & Donal Cahill & Tali Sharot, 2019. "Evidence accumulation is biased by motivation: A computational account," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Byron N. Van Nest & Darrell Moore, 2012. "Energetically optimal foraging strategy is emergent property of time-keeping behavior in honey bees," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 649-658.
    8. Carla J. Essenberg & Rebekah A. Easter & Rachel A. Simmons & Daniel R. Papaj, 2015. "The value of information in floral cues: bumblebee learning of floral size cues," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1335-1344.
    9. Boris Granovskiy & Tanya Latty & Michael Duncan & David J. T. Sumpter & Madeleine Beekman, 2012. "How dancing honey bees keep track of changes: the role of inspector bees," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 588-596.
    10. Anna Dornhaus, 2011. "Finding optimal collective strategies using individual-based simulations: colony organization in social insects," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 25-37, May.
    11. Tsvetomira Radeva & Anna Dornhaus & Nancy Lynch & Radhika Nagpal & Hsin-Hao Su, 2017. "Costs of task allocation with local feedback: Effects of colony size and extra workers in social insects and other multi-agent systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-29, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:277:y:2014:i:c:p:119-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.