IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i2p368-374..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consistent waves of collective vigilance in groups using public information about predation risk

Author

Listed:
  • Guy Beauchamp
  • Peter Alexander
  • Roger Jovani

Abstract

Consistent waves of collective vigilance in prey groups using public information about predation risk. Antipredator vigilance models have long assumed that individuals in groups monitor threats independently from one another. This assumption has been challenged recently, both theoretically and empirically. In particular, recent models predict that individuals should pay attention to the vigilance state of their neighbors and become increasingly vigilant when the proportion of vigilant neighbors is higher. Such copying can lead to temporal waves of collective vigilance in groups rather than random fluctuations. Here, we investigated the robustness of these predicted waves under varying ecological situations. Using an individual-based modeling approach, we show that such waves are predicted to occur in small and large groups, when copying only involves the nearest neighbor or the radius of copying is small or large or when the shape of the group is square or rectangular. However, when the influence of neighbors was restricted (e.g., by reducing the radius of influence, by only considering the nearest neighbor, or in more elongated groups), waves involved a smaller proportion of the group. In general, collective patterns were more organized when the copying tendency was strong and the frequency at which individuals can switch state was not too high. Our results show that collective waves of vigilance are a robust phenomenon emerging from the individual social behavior of group members, thus encouraging empirical scrutiny of the connection between individual and group vigilance.

Suggested Citation

  • Guy Beauchamp & Peter Alexander & Roger Jovani, 2012. "Consistent waves of collective vigilance in groups using public information about predation risk," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 368-374.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:2:p:368-374.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr194
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caron-Lormier, Geoffrey & Humphry, Roger W. & Bohan, David A. & Hawes, Cathy & Thorbek, Pernille, 2008. "Asynchronous and synchronous updating in individual-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 212(3), pages 522-527.
    2. Olivier Pays & Michel Goulard & Simon P. Blomberg & Anne W. Goldizen & Etienne Sirot & Peter J. Jarman, 2009. "The effect of social facilitation on vigilance in the eastern gray kangaroo, Macropus giganteus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(3), pages 469-477.
    3. Olivier Pays & Anne-Laure Dubot & Peter J. Jarman & Patrice Loisel & Anne W. Goldizen, 2009. "Vigilance and its complex synchrony in the red-necked pademelon, Thylogale thetis," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(1), pages 22-29.
    4. Andrew L. Jackson & Graeme D. Ruxton, 2006. "Toward an individual-level understanding of vigilance: the role of social information," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(4), pages 532-538, July.
    5. Guy Beauchamp, 2008. "What is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(6), pages 1361-1368.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guillaume Rieucau & Pierrick Blanchard & Julien G A Martin & François-René Favreau & Anne W Goldizen & Olivier Pays, 2012. "Investigating Differences in Vigilance Tactic Use within and between the Sexes in Eastern Grey Kangaroos," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-8, September.
    2. Ross Richardson & Matteo G. Richiardi & Michael Wolfson, 2015. "We ran one billion agents. Scaling in simulation models," LABORatorio R. Revelli Working Papers Series 142, LABORatorio R. Revelli, Centre for Employment Studies.
    3. James D. A. Millington & Hang Xiong & Steve Peterson & Jeremy Woods, 2017. "Integrating Modelling Approaches for Understanding Telecoupling: Global Food Trade and Local Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-18, August.
    4. McLane, Adam J. & Semeniuk, Christina & McDermid, Gregory J. & Marceau, Danielle J., 2011. "The role of agent-based models in wildlife ecology and management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1544-1556.
    5. Elodie Letort & Pierre Dupraz & Laurent Piet, 2017. "The impact of environmental regulations on the farmland market and farm structures: An agent-based model applied to the Brittany region of France," Working Papers SMART 17-01, INRAE UMR SMART.
    6. Kieran M. Samuk & Emily E. LeDue & Leticia Avilés, 2012. "Sister clade comparisons reveal reduced maternal care behavior in social cobweb spiders," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 35-43.
    7. Nöldeke, Georg & Peña, Jorge, 2018. "Group size effects in social evolution," IAST Working Papers 18-75, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    8. Jennie M. Carr & Steven L. Lima, 2012. "Heat-conserving postures hinder escape: a thermoregulation–predation trade-off in wintering birds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 434-441.
    9. Dana M. Williams & Diogo S.M. Samia & William E. Cooper & Daniel T. Blumstein, 2014. "The flush early and avoid the rush hypothesis holds after accounting for spontaneous behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1136-1147.
    10. Alessandra F. Lütz & Annette Cazaubiel & Jeferson J. Arenzon, 2017. "Cyclic Competition and Percolation in Grouping Predator-Prey Populations," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, February.
    11. Pierre Broly & Jean-Louis Deneubourg, 2015. "Behavioural Contagion Explains Group Cohesion in a Social Crustacean," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Gloriana Chaverri & Erin H. Gillam & Thomas H. Kunz, 2013. "A call-and-response system facilitates group cohesion among disc-winged bats," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 481-487.
    13. Mouissie, A. Maarten & Apol, M. Emile F. & Heil, Gerrit W. & van Diggelen, Rudy, 2008. "Creation and preservation of vegetation patterns by grazing," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 60-72.
    14. Mancy, Rebecca & Prosser, Patrick & Rogers, Simon, 2013. "Discrete and continuous time simulations of spatial ecological processes predict different final population sizes and interspecific competition outcomes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 50-61.
    15. José Manuel Galán & Luis R. Izquierdo & Segismundo S. Izquierdo & José Ignacio Santos & Ricardo del Olmo & Adolfo López-Paredes & Bruce Edmonds, 2009. "Errors and Artefacts in Agent-Based Modelling," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 12(1), pages 1-1.
    16. Alice Charalabidis & François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont & Sandrine Petit & David A Bohan, 2017. "Risk of predation makes foragers less choosy about their food," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Xu, Yi & Chai, Fei & Rose, Kenneth A. & Ñiquen C., Miguel & Chavez, Francisco P., 2013. "Environmental influences on the interannual variation and spatial distribution of Peruvian anchovy (Engraulis ringens) population dynamics from 1991 to 2007: A three-dimensional modeling study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 264(C), pages 64-82.
    18. Gwizdałła, Tomasz M., 2015. "Some properties of the floor field cellular automata evacuation model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 419(C), pages 718-728.
    19. Travers-Trolet, Morgane & Coppin, Franck & Cresson, Pierre & Cugier, Philippe & Oliveros-Ramos, Ricardo & Verley, Philippe, 2019. "Emergence of negative trophic level-size relationships from a size-based, individual-based multispecies fish model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 410(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Caron-Lormier, Geoffrey & Bohan, David A. & Hawes, Cathy & Raybould, Alan & Haughton, Alison J. & Humphry, Roger W., 2009. "How might we model an ecosystem?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(17), pages 1935-1949.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:2:p:368-374.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.