IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v259y2013icp50-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discrete and continuous time simulations of spatial ecological processes predict different final population sizes and interspecific competition outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Mancy, Rebecca
  • Prosser, Patrick
  • Rogers, Simon

Abstract

Cellular automata (CAs) are commonly used to simulate spatial processes in ecology. Although appropriate for modelling events that occur at discrete time points, they are also routinely used to model biological processes that take place continuously. We report on a study comparing predictions of discrete time CA models to those of their continuous time counterpart. Specifically, we investigate how the decision to model time discretely or continuously affects predictions regarding long-run population sizes, the probability of extinction and interspecific competition. We show effects on predicted ecological outcomes, finding quantitative differences in all cases and in the case of interspecific competition, additional qualitative differences in predictions regarding species dominance. Our findings demonstrate that qualitative conclusions drawn from spatial simulations can be critically dependent on the decision to model time discretely or continuously. Contrary to our expectations, simulating in continuous time did not incur a heavy computational penalty. We also raise ecological questions on the relative benefits of reproductive strategies that take place in discrete and continuous time.

Suggested Citation

  • Mancy, Rebecca & Prosser, Patrick & Rogers, Simon, 2013. "Discrete and continuous time simulations of spatial ecological processes predict different final population sizes and interspecific competition outcomes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 50-61.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:259:y:2013:i:c:p:50-61
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.03.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380013001701
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.03.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachael Fleurence & Christopher Hollenbeak, 2007. "Rates and Probabilities in Economic Modelling," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 3-6, January.
    2. Birch, Colin P.D. & Oom, Sander P. & Beecham, Jonathan A., 2007. "Rectangular and hexagonal grids used for observation, experiment and simulation in ecology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 347-359.
    3. Caron-Lormier, Geoffrey & Humphry, Roger W. & Bohan, David A. & Hawes, Cathy & Thorbek, Pernille, 2008. "Asynchronous and synchronous updating in individual-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 212(3), pages 522-527.
    4. E Penelope Holland & James N Aegerter & Calvin Dytham & Graham C Smith, 2007. "Landscape as a Model: The Importance of Geometry," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-14, October.
    5. John Vandermeer & Ivette Perfecto & Stacy M. Philpott, 2008. "Clusters of ant colonies and robust criticality in a tropical agroecosystem," Nature, Nature, vol. 451(7177), pages 457-459, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ross Richardson & Matteo G. Richiardi & Michael Wolfson, 2015. "We ran one billion agents. Scaling in simulation models," LABORatorio R. Revelli Working Papers Series 142, LABORatorio R. Revelli, Centre for Employment Studies.
    2. James D. A. Millington & Hang Xiong & Steve Peterson & Jeremy Woods, 2017. "Integrating Modelling Approaches for Understanding Telecoupling: Global Food Trade and Local Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Vinatier, F. & Chauvet, M., 2017. "A neutral model for the simulation of linear networks in territories," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 363(C), pages 8-16.
    4. Sungsoo Yoon & Youngjoo Moon & Jinah Jeong & Chan-Ryul Park & Wanmo Kang, 2021. "A Network-Based Approach for Reducing Pedestrian Exposure to PM 2.5 Induced by Road Traffic in Seoul," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    5. McLane, Adam J. & Semeniuk, Christina & McDermid, Gregory J. & Marceau, Danielle J., 2011. "The role of agent-based models in wildlife ecology and management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1544-1556.
    6. Elodie Letort & Pierre Dupraz & Laurent Piet, 2017. "The impact of environmental regulations on the farmland market and farm structures: An agent-based model applied to the Brittany region of France," Working Papers SMART 17-01, INRAE UMR SMART.
    7. Ortigoza, Gerardo M., 2015. "Unstructured triangular cellular automata for modeling geographic spread," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 258(C), pages 520-536.
    8. Christopher T. Emrich & Yao Zhou & Sanam K. Aksha & Herbert E. Longenecker, 2022. "Creating a Nationwide Composite Hazard Index Using Empirically Based Threat Assessment Approaches Applied to Open Geospatial Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, February.
    9. Maria Fabrizia Clemente, 2022. "The Future Impacts of ESL Events in Euro-Mediterranean Coastal Cities: The Coast-RiskBySea Model to Assess the Potential Economic Damages in Naples, Marseille and Barcelona," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Ryzhkov, Alexander & Sarzhan, Yuliya, 2020. "Market initiative and central planning: A study of the Moscow bus network," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    11. Marchetti, Yuliya & Nguyen, Hai & Braverman, Amy & Cressie, Noel, 2018. "Spatial data compression via adaptive dispersion clustering," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 138-153.
    12. İ. Esra Büyüktahtakın & Robert G. Haight, 2018. "A review of operations research models in invasive species management: state of the art, challenges, and future directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 357-403, December.
    13. Nogueira Terra, Talita & Ferreira dos Santos, Rozely, 2012. "Measuring cumulative effects in a fragmented landscape," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 89-95.
    14. Slone, D.H., 2011. "Increasing accuracy of dispersal kernels in grid-based population models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 573-579.
    15. Burdziej Jan, 2019. "Using hexagonal grids and network analysis for spatial accessibility assessment in urban environments – a case study of public amenities in Toruń," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 99-110, June.
    16. Pasquale De Toro & Enrico Formato & Nicola Fierro, 2023. "Sustainability Assessments of Peri-Urban Areas: An Evaluation Model for the Territorialization of the Sustainable Development Goals," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-32, July.
    17. Kıbış, Eyyüb Y. & Büyüktahtakın, İ. Esra, 2017. "Optimizing invasive species management: A mixed-integer linear programming approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 308-321.
    18. Pereira, Rafael H.M., 2019. "Future accessibility impacts of transport policy scenarios: Equity and sensitivity to travel time thresholds for Bus Rapid Transit expansion in Rio de Janeiro," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 321-332.
    19. Kunegel-Lion, Mélodie & Neilson, Eric W. & Mansuy, Nicolas & Goodsman, Devin W., 2022. "Habitat quality does not predict animal population abundance on frequently disturbed landscapes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 469(C).
    20. Wallentin, Gudrun, 2017. "Spatial simulation: A spatial perspective on individual-based ecology—a review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 350(C), pages 30-41.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:259:y:2013:i:c:p:50-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.