IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2017i1p297-305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Sustainability For Romanian Companies - European Structural Funds Between Inter-Regional Cohesion Or Division? Part Ii

Author

Listed:
  • Laurentiu Droj

    (University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, Finance and Accounting Department, Oradea, Romania)

  • Gabriela Droj

    (University of Oradea, Faculty of Building Construction, Cadastre and Architecture, Cadastre and Architecture Department, Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

This article contains the second part of the study “Financial sustainability for Romanian companies - European Structural Funds between inter-regional cohesion and division?” The first part of the study presented several aspects regarding the literature review, selection of the case study analysis of data based on simple statistical methods and several conclusions. This part of the study goes even deeper in the specialized literature presenting the new opinions regarding the efficiency and sustainability for usage of EU funding at the regional level. These opinions also signal several warning signs, especially when considering the increasing economic division between developed and less developed regions or regarding. Also was mentioned the dilemma between equity, which is ensured by the funding proposed to be delivered in the rural areas for ensuring the convergence policy and competitiveness which is obtained by investment high developed area in order to gain further growth. In order to establish the methodology, were analysed the most common approaches in assessing the efficiency of aid in general and European Structural Funds in particular: statistical data analysis, Social Accounting Matrix, Regionalized Hermin, Combined macro and regional model Applied Spatial New Economic Geography, GeoCells a multi-layered hierarchical automaton and Econometric methods. Since none of the studies were focused on the effects of EU funding over the private companies the authors tried to tackle this issue in the current study. Based on a database formed from 493 small and medium sized Romanian companies which directly benefitted from EU investment funding the authors decided to create, for the data analysis, a mixed methodology between the Spatial Data Analysis, Corporate finance and Econometrics. In order to solve the “dilemma” the paper through its case study assessed if there is a link between the efficiency of accessing European funds and the economic development of certain regions. This was done especially by comparing the efficiency of EU funded SMEs projects from well-developed counties with those located in less-developed counties, inside the same region.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurentiu Droj & Gabriela Droj, 2017. "Financial Sustainability For Romanian Companies - European Structural Funds Between Inter-Regional Cohesion Or Division? Part Ii," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 297-305, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:297-305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2017/n1/28.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrej Horvat & Gunther Maier, 2004. "Regional development, Absorption problems and the EU Structural Funds," ERSA conference papers ersa04p591, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Busillo & Teo Muccigrosso & Guido Pellegrini & Ornella Tarola & Terribile, 2010. "Measuring the Impact of the European Regional Policy on Economic Growth: a Regression Discontinuity Design Approach," Working Papers 6/10, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
    3. Chiara Del Bo & Massimo Florio & Silvia Vignetti & Emanuela Sirtori, 2011. "Additionality and regional development: are EU Structural Funds complements or substitutes of national Public Finance?," Working Papers 201101, CSIL Centre for Industrial Studies.
    4. Sebastien Bourdin, 2012. "Modeling and simulation of European Structural Funds: convergence or divergence of regions with the enlargement ?," ERSA conference papers ersa12p163, European Regional Science Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Riccardo Crescenzi & Mara Giua, 2018. "One or Many Cohesion Policies of the European Union? On the Diverging Impacts of Cohesion Policy across Member States," SERC Discussion Papers 0230, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Ceausescu Ionut, 2016. "Examples Of Good Practice Needed In Implementation Of The European Funds," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 136-140, August.
    3. repec:jes:wpaper:y:2011:v:3:p:480-487 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Vera A. Adamchik & Thomas J. Hyclak, 2013. "The Evolution Of Regional Wage Differentials In A Transition Economy: Evidence From Poland," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(5), pages 1-13.
    5. Cerina, Fabio & Mureddu, Francesco, 2014. "Is agglomeration really good for growth? Global efficiency, interregional equity and uneven growth," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 9-22.
    6. Marco Di Cataldo, 2016. "Gaining and losing EU Objective 1 funds: Regional development in Britain and the prospect of Brexit," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 120, European Institute, LSE.
    7. Emanuele Ciani & Guido de Blasio, 2015. "European structural funds during the crisis: evidence from Southern Italy," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-31, December.
    8. Zaman, Gheorghe & Georgescu, George, 2009. "Structural Fund Absorption: A New Challenge For Romania?," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 6(1), pages 136-154, March.
    9. Laura MARINAS & Eugen PRIOTEASA, 2015. "Views on the Absorption Rate of the European Social Fund in Romania," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(3), pages 354-371, July.
    10. Guido Pellegrini & Augusto Cerqua, 2011. "Are the subsidies to private capital useful? A Multiple Regression Discontinuity Design Approach1," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1323, European Regional Science Association.
    11. Popescu Anca Simina, 2015. "The Absorption Capacity Of European Funds – Concepts," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 119-125, June.
    12. Tomasz Jałowiec & Henryk Wojtaszek & Ireneusz Miciuła, 2022. "Analysis of the Potential Management of the Low-Carbon Energy Transformation by 2050," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-29, March.
    13. Mara Giua, 2014. "Spatial Discontinuity for the Impact Assessment of the EU Regional Policy. The Case of Italian Objective 1 Regions," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0197, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    14. Maria Loredana POPESCU & Carmen Valentina RADULESCU & Dumitru Alexandru BODISLAV, 2018. "Improving Administrative Capacity in European Funds Absorbtion for Region South-West Oltenia," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Carmen NÄ‚STASE (ed.), The 14th Economic International Conference: Strategies and Development Policies of Territories: International, Country, Region, City, Location Challen, edition 1, volume 6, chapter 17, pages 181-191, Editura Lumen.
    15. Claudiu George Bocean, 2012. "Absorption Capacity Of Eu Funds In Romania," Revista Tinerilor Economisti (The Young Economists Journal), University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(18), pages 123-130, April.
    16. Cristina García Nicolás & José María Cantos Cantos, 2018. "Regional Community Policy: Does Aid Received from the EU Displace Funding by Member States?," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 224(1), pages 87-112, March.
    17. Marco Di Cataldo, 2015. "The long-term impact of Objective 1 funding on unemployment and labour market disparities: Evidence from the UK," ERSA conference papers ersa15p104, European Regional Science Association.
    18. Irina Bosie (Ungureanu) & Andrei Puicã, 2011. "Romanian Administrative Capacity Of European Funds Absobtion," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 3(4), pages 480-487, December.
    19. Carmen Beatrice Pauna, 2013. "Innovative Clusters in Times of Economic Crisis. Case Study Romania," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 9(4), pages 105-116, August.
    20. Laurentiu Droj & Ioan Gheorghe Tara & Gabriela Droj, 2017. "Financial Sustainability For Romanian Companies - European Structural Funds Between Inter-Regional Cohesion Or Division? Part I," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 287-295, July.
    21. Mindaugas Butkus & Alma Maciulyte-Sniukiene & Renata Macaitiene & Kristina Matuzeviciute, 2021. "A New Approach to Examine Non-Linear and Mediated Growth and Convergence Outcomes of Cohesion Policy," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-28, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    SME; Financial analysis; Absorption capacity; Foreign Aid; Efficiency; European structural Funds; Cohesion policy; economic efficiency;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F35 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Aid
    • F36 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics
    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance
    • R15 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Econometric and Input-Output Models; Other Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:297-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.