IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2014i1p1149-1155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dysfunctions In The Application Of The Managerial Control Systems In Romanian Public Institutions: The Reporting Improprieties, The Information And The Communication Standards

Author

Listed:
  • CRĂCIUN Liviu

    (Craiova University, Economics and Business Administration Faculty,)

  • BĂLOI Ionut-Cosmin

    (Craiova University, Economics and Business Administration Faculty,)

Abstract

The development level of managerial control systems in the Romanian public entities is not a remarkable one, on the contrary, some institutions do not understand the real usefulness of the internal control system and the related set of standards; the compliance is determined only by the regulatory norms. The practice of implementing the internal control proves that the perception of executives and middle managers regarding that system is not a favourable and supporting one. The managers face difficulties caused by the ambiguity of some of the standards, poorly understood, and for which the body of laws does not provide advices. Thus, some institutions report the high compliance of standards, although the reality shows numerous inconsistencies. Other public institutions assess their own level of implementation only partially, but do not identify improvement solutions. Because of the lacking of benchmarking initiatives and knowledge transferring between institutions, the picture of this situation indicates dysfunctions that influence the efficiency of the activities and the achievement of the objectives. In this paper, we will analyze the correlation between the observed shortcomings in the implementation of three of the most important standards, namely the Reporting improprieties, the Information and the Communication. The methodology used is an analytical and exploratory one and critically examines the implementation status of these three standards in more than 40 public institutions in Dolj County, Romania. Also, by analyzing the answers to the questionnaire, our study identifies differences in interpretation and implementation of these standards between certain types of organizations (given the heterogeneity of the investigated sample). The results show a high interdependence between this control standards and our proposals focus on the strengthening of the interpersonal skills and the personal relationships. Our study is directed toward the conclusion that the three internal/managerial control standards and their potential impact on the organizational optimization are not optimal exploited.

Suggested Citation

  • CRĂCIUN Liviu & BĂLOI Ionut-Cosmin, 2014. "Dysfunctions In The Application Of The Managerial Control Systems In Romanian Public Institutions: The Reporting Improprieties, The Information And The Communication Standards," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 1149-1155, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:1149-1155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2014/n1/127.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rhys Andrews & George A. Boyne & Jennifer Law & Richard M. Walker, 2012. "Strategic Management and Public Service Performance," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-34943-8.
    2. Miller, Karen C. & Proctor, Thomas Y. & Fulton, Benjamin, 2013. "Teaching managerial responsibilities for internal controls: Perception gaps between accounting and management professors," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justice Mensah, 2020. "Improving Quality Management in Higher Education Institutions in Developing Countries through Strategic Planning," Asian Journal of Contemporary Education, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(1), pages 9-25, June.
    2. Juan-Pierré BRUWER & Houdini FOURIE & Tracy BECK, 2019. "Considering the Control Legacy-K (CLK) Framework to Serve as a Basis for a Measuring Instrument to Assess the Control Environment of Non-JSE Listed Business Entities," Expert Journal of Business and Management, Sprint Investify, vol. 7(2), pages 271-279.
    3. Ilir TOMORRI & Remzi KECO & Gentjan MEHMETI & Shpresim DOMI, 2020. "The Performance Assessment Of Public Sector In Albania," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(34), pages 170-180, June.
    4. Andrea Bonomi Savignon & Lorenzo Costumato & Benedetta Marchese, 2019. "Performance Budgeting in Context: An Analysis of Italian Central Administrations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E., 2015. "Accounting education literature review (2013–2014)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 69-127.
    6. Germà Bel & Thomas Elston, 2022. ""When the Time is Right: Testing for Dynamic Effects in Collaborative Performance"," IREA Working Papers 202212, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Jul 2022.
    7. Muhamad Nur Afandi & Saekul Anwar & Fandi Ahmad, 2018. "Mediating Role of Managerial and Stakeholder Involvement in the Effect of Formal Strategic Planning on Strategic Implementation Success: Case of Municipal Government in Cirebon, West Java," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(3), pages 638-651, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public institutions; internal/managerial control; control standards; reporting improprieties;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:1149-1155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.