IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/iisabg/y2017i2p87-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Logic Models: Strengths and Weaknesses in the Context of Programmes Funded by the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Albena Vutsova

    (Sofia University, Bulgaria)

  • Daniel Nigohosyan

    (Sofia University, Bulgaria)

Abstract

The main objective of the study is to provide opportunities for improvement of the logical model used in the European Union (EU) programming. The study provides an overview of the varieties of logical models, which starts with basic logic models, gradually increasing their complexity. The analysis identifies strengths and weaknesses of the models as well as their application by the European Commission (EC). In view of the identified deficiencies, the study proposes a new model that takes into account the bidirectional links between the elements of the logic model and the possible impact of external factors on each element of the model. The proposed model also includes additional elements that take into account the need for application of the outputs/results; the general objectives of a program, and best practices. Even the partial implementation of the proposed model in this study, allows the identification of weaknesses in the EU programming. In this case, they consist of: too general objectives; weak link between indicators and targets; disregard of prior experience (best practices) and lack of consideration of the general objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Albena Vutsova & Daniel Nigohosyan, 2017. "Logic Models: Strengths and Weaknesses in the Context of Programmes Funded by the European Union," Ikonomiceski i Sotsialni Alternativi, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 87-101, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nwe:iisabg:y:2017:i:2:p:87-101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.unwe.bg/uploads/Alternatives/7_IA_br_2%202017_BG.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    logic models; European Union; operational programmes;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H81 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Governmental Loans; Loan Guarantees; Credits; Grants; Bailouts
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • H89 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:iisabg:y:2017:i:2:p:87-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.