IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/eajour/y2019i4p537-548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development: Crossing the Bridge Pondering Socio-Economic and Techno-Science

Author

Listed:
  • Nikolaos Karanasios

    (International Hellenic University, Serres, Greece)

  • Antje Tandetzky

    (Department of Business Administration, DHBW Mannheim, Germany)

  • Antonella Reitano

    (Dipartimento di scienze aziendali e giuridiche, Universita della Calabria, Italy)

  • Marco Fazio

    (Dipartimento di scienze aziendali e giuridiche, Universita della Calabria, Italy)

  • Elena Stavrova

    (South-West University "Neofit Rilsky", Bulgaria)

Abstract

Applied science, society needs and economy development are three main pillars of the technology progress nowadays. As they are quite independent of each other they have their own path for advancing. Nevertheless, science, society and economy should bring the world in the Future together. It is stated that there is a strong need for pondering these advancing sciences, because they affect one another and so they may increase their effectiveness. Several techno-science empirical observations seem to support the hypothesis that interaction and reciprocal influence is necessary with social and economic sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikolaos Karanasios & Antje Tandetzky & Antonella Reitano & Marco Fazio & Elena Stavrova, 2019. "Development: Crossing the Bridge Pondering Socio-Economic and Techno-Science," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 4, pages 537-548, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2019:i:4:p:537-548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.unwe.bg/doi/eajournal/2019.4/EA.2019.4.03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brey, Philip, 2018. "The strategic role of technology in a good society," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 39-45.
    2. Joel Mokyr & Chris Vickers & Nicolas L. Ziebarth, 2015. "The History of Technological Anxiety and the Future of Economic Growth: Is This Time Different?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(3), pages 31-50, Summer.
    3. Budnitz, Robert J. & Rogner, H-Holger & Shihab-Eldin, Adnan, 2018. "Expansion of nuclear power technology to new countries – SMRs, safety culture issues, and the need for an improved international safety regime," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 535-544.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grande, Rafael & Muñoz de Bustillo, Rafael & Fernández Macías, Enrique & Antón, José Ignacio, 2020. "Innovation and job quality. A firm-level exploration," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 130-142.
    2. Ville-Veikko Pulkka, 2017. "A free lunch with robots – can a basic income stabilise the digital economy?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(3), pages 295-311, August.
    3. Zhou, Yixiao & Tyers, Rod, 2019. "Automation and inequality in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. Mark Knell & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Tools and concepts for understanding disruptive technological change after Schumpeter," Jena Economics Research Papers 2022-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    5. Quamrul H. Ashraf & Francesco Cinnirella & Oded Galor & Boris Gershman & Erik Hornung, 2017. "Capital-Skill Complementarity and the Emergence of Labor Emancipation," Working Papers 2017-1, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    6. Singh, Anuraag & Triulzi, Giorgio & Magee, Christopher L., 2021. "Technological improvement rate predictions for all technologies: Use of patent data and an extended domain description," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    7. Steven Ruggles, 2015. "Patriarchy, Power, and Pay: The Transformation of American Families, 1800–2015," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 52(6), pages 1797-1823, December.
    8. Fan Zeng & Chris Kwan Yu Lo & Stacy Hyun Nam Lee, 2021. "Will Communication of Job Creation Facilitate Diffusion of Innovations in the Automobile Industry?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Miraç Fatih İLGÜN, 2020. "Industry 4.0 and Transformation in Public Finance: An Assessment by Government Expenditures," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 28(44).
    10. M. Battisti & M. Del Gatto & A. F. Gravina & C. F. Parmeter, 2021. "Robots versus labor skills: a complementarity/substitutability analysis," Working Paper CRENoS 202104, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    11. Marc Gilbert Joseph Buchholzer, 2022. "Review of International Comparative Management Volume 23, Issue 1, March 2022 101 Value-ADDED Automation, a Solution for the Future of Work in Automotive Manufacturing in Romania," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(1), pages 101-111, March.
    12. Janine Berg & Francis Green & Laura Nurski & David A Spencer, 2023. "Risks to job quality from digital technologies: Are industrial relations in Europe ready for the challenge?," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 29(4), pages 347-365, December.
    13. Epting, Shane, 2021. "Vulnerable groups, virtual cities, and social isolation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    14. Mehmet Ugur & Sefa Awaworyi Churchill & Edna Solomon, 2018. "Technological Innovation And Employment In Derived Labour Demand Models: A Hierarchical Meta†Regression Analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 50-82, February.
    15. Komlos John, 2016. "Has Creative Destruction become more Destructive?," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 16(4), pages 1-12, October.
    16. Jeffrey L. Furman & Florenta Teodoridis, 2020. "Automation, Research Technology, and Researchers’ Trajectories: Evidence from Computer Science and Electrical Engineering," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 330-354, March.
    17. Savona, María, 2020. "A “new normal” as a “new essential”? COVID-19, digital transformations and employment structures," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    18. Ugur, Mehmet & Awaworyi, Sefa & Solomon, Edna, 2016. "Technological innovation and employment in derived labour demand models: A hierarchical meta-regression analysis," MPRA Paper 73557, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Aniruddh Mohan & Parth Vaishnav, 2022. "Impact of automation on long haul trucking operator-hours in the United States," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Siegmann, K.A. & Ivosevic, P. & Visser, O., 2021. "Working like machines: Exploring effects of technological change on migrant labour in Dutch horticulture," ISS Working Papers - General Series 691, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research; innovation; technology; Adaptation; Sci Tech; Scientific; Technical; Economic Sociology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2019:i:4:p:537-548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.