IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntj/journl/v68y2015i4p975-998.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Benefits From the Tax Advantages of Organizational Form Choice?

Author

Listed:
  • Michael P. Donohoe
  • Petro Lisowsky
  • Michael A. Mayberry

Abstract

We investigate whether and the extent to which four stakeholders of a firm — customers, suppliers, employees, and owners — benefit from the savings under Subchapter S relative to Subchapter C. Using a balanced sample of U.S. commercial banks from 2001–2005, we find that S corporation banks pay 2 percent more in wages and 38 percent more in dividends than C corporation banks, but pay lower interest rates on deposits and charge similar rates on loans. Further, after the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief and Reconciliation Act of 2003 attenuated the relative tax advantage of Subchapter S, we find that S corporation banks increased wages and dividends to a lesser extent than C corporation banks. These results suggest that employees and owners, but not suppliers or customers, benefit from the tax advantages of the Subchapter S organizational form. Overall, our study provides economic insight into which parties ultimately bear — and do not bear — the incidence of corporate taxation.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael P. Donohoe & Petro Lisowsky & Michael A. Mayberry, 2015. "Who Benefits From the Tax Advantages of Organizational Form Choice?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 68(4), pages 975-998, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:68:y:2015:i:4:p:975-998
    DOI: 10.17310/ntj.2015.4.04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2015.4.04
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2015.4.04
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17310/ntj.2015.4.04?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gawehn, Vanessa, 2019. "Banks and corporate income taxation: A review," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 247, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    2. Olsen, Jerome & Kasper, Matthias & Kogler, Christoph & Muehlbacher, Stephan & Kirchler, Erich, 2019. "Mental accounting of income tax and value added tax among self-employed business owners," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 125-139.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:68:y:2015:i:4:p:975-998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The University of Chicago Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ntanet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.