IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnljmb/107.00000005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Percentage Cost Discounts Always Beat Percentage Benefit Bonuses: Helping Consumers Evaluate Nominally Equivalent Percentage Changes

Author

Listed:
  • Mohan, Bhavya
  • Chandon, Pierre
  • Riis, Jason

Abstract

Marketing offers that are framed as a “percentage change†in consumer cost vs. benefit can have highly non-linear impacts in terms of actual value for consumers. Even though two offers might appear identical, we show that consumers are better off choosing the offer framed as a percentage cost change over one framed as the opposite percentage benefit change, regardless of whether the net result is a gain (e.g., 50% less cost is better than 50% more benefit) or a loss (e.g., 50% less benefit is worse than 50% more cost) and regardless of whether costs or benefits are in the nominator or denominator of the standard rate (cost/benefit or benefit/cost). Three lab studies and one field experiment show that a majority of consumers (and particularly those with low numeracy) fail to accurately recognize the superiority of percentage cost changes over percentage benefit changes across various tasks and contexts. Even highly numerate consumers are prone to error. However, the provision of salient standard rates can reduce consumer error.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohan, Bhavya & Chandon, Pierre & Riis, Jason, 2015. "Percentage Cost Discounts Always Beat Percentage Benefit Bonuses: Helping Consumers Evaluate Nominally Equivalent Percentage Changes," Journal of Marketing Behavior, now publishers, vol. 1(1), pages 75-107, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnljmb:107.00000005
    DOI: 10.1561/107.00000005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/107.00000005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/107.00000005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schöber, Timo & Stadtmann, Georg, 2020. "Fortnite: The business model pattern behind the scene," Discussion Papers 415, European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Department of Business Administration and Economics.
    2. Necati Ertekin & Jeffrey D. Shulman & Haipeng (Allan) Chen, 2019. "On the Profitability of Stacked Discounts: Identifying Revenue and Cost Effects of Discount Framing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 317-342, March.
    3. Schöber, Timo & Stadtmann, Georg, 2020. "Fortnite: The business model pattern behind the scene," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 74(4), pages 426-444.
    4. Cadario, Romain & Parguel, Béatrice & Benoit-Moreau, Florence, 2016. "Is bigger always better? The unit effect in carbon emissions information," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 204-207.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnljmb:107.00000005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.