IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/fntmkt/1700000009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Sense and Nonsense of Consumer Product Testing: How to Identify Whether Consumers Are Blindly Loyal?

Author

Listed:
  • Raghubir, Priya
  • Tyebjee, Tyzoon T.
  • Lin, Ying-Ching

Abstract

This paper builds on recent research that shows that product experience is based on the interaction of a range of sensory cues whose effect is non-conscious (e.g., visual cues affect taste perception) to revisit the classic issue of product taste testing. We propose that as consumers are unaware of the influence of a range of stimuli on their judgments and experience it is difficult for managers to collect valid and reliable consumer insights regarding the manner in which perceptual and sensory cues affect judgments and how they interact with each other. Therefore, we propose that the methodological paradigm of taste testing can and should be used to examine the effect of strategic and tactical marketing mix decisions in domains when consumer decision-making is non-conscious. Based on previous academic research, specific directions for managers to execute the test are provided: How to design and conduct a taste test, what measures to include and why, and how to analyze taste test results. We provide an example of the insight the methodology can provide using three related taste tests. While we use the attribute of taste as a specific example, the methodology and results can be translated into other domains where consumers may not be able to accurately explicate the reasons for their product experience, but that drive marketing decisions, including and beyond changing intrinsic product attributes.

Suggested Citation

  • Raghubir, Priya & Tyebjee, Tyzoon T. & Lin, Ying-Ching, 2009. "The Sense and Nonsense of Consumer Product Testing: How to Identify Whether Consumers Are Blindly Loyal?," Foundations and Trends(R) in Marketing, now publishers, vol. 3(3), pages 127-176, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:fntmkt:1700000009
    DOI: 10.1561/1700000009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1700000009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/1700000009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:fntmkt:1700000009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.