IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nov/artigo/v26y2016i2p623-651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidências de subsídio cruzado no setor de saneamento básico nacional e suas consequências [Evidence of cross-subsidy in the Brazilian national sanitation sector and its consequences]

Author

Listed:
  • Karlos Arcanjo da Cruz

    (UFPE)

  • Francisco de Sousa Ramos

    (UFPE)

Abstract

This study examined the several occurrences of cross-subsidy in the Brazilian sanitation sector. We perceived its existence among the following groups: consumers, residential, commercial, industrial, and the public sector. The phenomenon also manifests itself under several guises: by level of consumption, since consumers who consume more pay a higher unit cost of water than others; among products, since water services are sometimes subsidized by sewage services; and among localities, for althought the costs of water collection, treatment, and distribution are not uniform among municipalities in a given state, the rates practised in certain cases are the same. As a result, we found that these mechanisms 1) induce superfluous consumption, 2) result in relatively wealthy people being subsidized by their less-favored brethren, and 3) generate intermunicipal conflicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Karlos Arcanjo da Cruz & Francisco de Sousa Ramos, 2016. "Evidências de subsídio cruzado no setor de saneamento básico nacional e suas consequências [Evidence of cross-subsidy in the Brazilian national sanitation sector and its consequences]," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 26(2), pages 623-651, May-Augus.
  • Handle: RePEc:nov:artigo:v:26:y:2016:i:2:p:623-651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/neco/v26n2/1980-5381-neco-26-02-00623.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-63512016000200623&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cross-subsidy; sanitation; natural monopoly;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • L12 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nov:artigo:v:26:y:2016:i:2:p:623-651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucas Resende de Carvalho (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fufmgbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.