IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/ojbutx/7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvement of the model of the innovative development of the production system of industrial enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Skrynkovskyy Ruslan

    (Lviv University of Business and Law)

  • Sopilnyk Lyubomyr

    (Lviv University of Business and Law)

  • Heorhiadi Nellі

    (Lviv Polytechnic National University)

  • Kniaz Sviatoslav

    (Lviv Polytechnic National University)

Abstract

The object of research is the features of the formation, use and development of the economic and mathematical model of the innovative development of the production system of industrial enterprises (IE). One of the main problems in the field of modeling innovation processes and optimizing the development processes of IE production systems is that the existing economic and mathematical models of the innovative development of the production system do not take into account the task of optimizing the production program in the operational management system. Here the interrelation of control accounts of digraphic accounting is important, based on the analysis of the specific features of the IE production capacity in the system for ensuring its competitiveness. In the process of research, the methods of generalization, systematization, system analysis, economic and mathematical modeling and a graphic method are used. With the help of these methods, a system of relations (equations) of the economical and mathematical model of the innovative development of the IE production system is proposed and theoretical principles are substantiated. As well as, existing solutions are systematized and practical recommendations for determining an option from an acceptable variant of the IE production program of an option that satisfies the conditions of production and optimizes the objective function in the “costs – production volume – profit” system are improved. Namely – the optimal ratio of the volume of production (sales) of products with the costs and the absolute financial criterion of development (net profit) of the enterprise. It is found that the production system of a modern IE should take into account the conceptual framework for determining the break-even and effective production volumes and consists of 3 subsystems: the “innovation” subsystem, the “development” subsystem and the “production” subsystem. The economical and mathematical model of the innovative development of the IE production system based on the business model for determining the break-even and effective production volumes in the system “costs – production volume – profit” in the enterprise is improved. And also takes into account the task of optimizing the production program in the system of operational management, taking into account the relationship of control accounts of digraphic accounting. The presented research should be considered when improving the IE system-oriented diagnostics and monitoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Skrynkovskyy Ruslan & Sopilnyk Lyubomyr & Heorhiadi Nellі & Kniaz Sviatoslav, 2019. "Improvement of the model of the innovative development of the production system of industrial enterprises," Technology audit and production reserves, 1(45) 2019, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 1(4(45)), pages 51-53.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:ojbutx:7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/159227
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Skrynkovskyy Ruslan & Pavlenchyk Nataliya & Horbonos Fedir & Protsiuk Tetiana, 2018. "Improvement of the express diagnostics of the production activity of the enterprise taking into account the method of determining the optimal production programs in the operational management system," Technology audit and production reserves, 6(44) 2018, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 6(4(44)), pages 4-10.
    2. Toyohiro Kono, 1984. "Strategy and Structure of Japanese Enterprises," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-17627-4.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Skrynkovskyy Ruslan & Sopilnyk Rostyslav & Seliverstova Liudmyla & Koropetskyi Oleh & Protsiuk Tetiana, 2019. "Improvement of the system of indicators for the efficiency evaluation of the production capacity of industrial enterprises," Technology audit and production reserves, 2(46) 2019, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 2(4(46)), pages 49-51.
    2. Ruslan Skrynkovskyy & Lyubomyr Sopilnyk & Fedir Horbonos & Sviatoslav Kniaz & Nataliia Pavlenchyk & Volodymyr Yuzevych, 2019. "Improvement of the Model for Calculating the Operating Profit of Industrial Enterprises Taking into Account the Problem of Optimal Distribution of Productive Resources," Traektoriâ Nauki = Path of Science, Altezoro, s.r.o. & Dialog, vol. 5(3), pages 5011-5017, March.
    3. Ulgado, Francis M., 1997. "Location decision-making characteristics of foreign direct investment in the United States," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 271-293, June.
    4. Park, Namgyoo K. & Cho, Dong-Sung, 1997. "The effect of strategic alliance on performance," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 155-164.
    5. Baruch A. Kipnis & Erik A. Swyngedouw, 1988. "Manufacturing Plant Size - Toward a Regional Strategy. A Case Study in Limburg, Belgium," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 25(1), pages 43-52, February.
    6. Hideshi Itoh, 2003. "Corporate Restructuring in Japan Part I: Can M‐Form Organization Manage Diverse Businesses?," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 54(1), pages 49-73, March.
    7. Stuart Holland & Andrew Black, 2018. "Cherchez la Firme: Redressing the Missing – Meso – Middle in Mainstream Economics," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 7(2), pages 15-53, November.
    8. Michael Hechter & Satoshi Kanazawa, 1993. "Group Solidarity and Social Order in Japan," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 5(4), pages 455-493, October.
    9. John Benson, 1994. "The Economic Effects of Unionism on Japanese Manufacturing Enterprises," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Gregory Wegmann & Johei Oshita, 2018. "A comparison between Japanese and French cost management-Contingency and institutional perspectives," Post-Print halshs-01961763, HAL.
    11. Brouthers, Lance Eliot & Lamb, Charles W., 1995. "National ideology, public policy, and the business environment: A contingency approach to economic reform in Hungary, Poland and Eastern Europe," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 355-372, September.
    12. Hodaka Morita, 2002. "Multiskilling, Delegation, and Continuous Process Improvement: A Comparative Analysis of U.S.-Japanese Work Organizations," Labor and Demography 0207004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Hideaki Sakawa & Naoki Watanabel, 2021. "Family Control and Corporate Innovation in Stakeholder-Oriented Corporate Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    innovative development of the enterprise production system; enterprise production program; operational management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C01 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Econometrics
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • M54 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:ojbutx:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алина Макаренко (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socionet.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.