IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/wsimit/10.5771-0342-300x-2016-2-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bonuszahlungen an Manager. Eine Szenarienanalyse zu Gerechtigkeitsurteilen

Author

Listed:
  • Struck, Olaf
  • Dütsch, Matthias
  • Stephan, Gesine

Abstract

With regard to salaries and bonuses for managers in Germany, it is often criticised that high wages and in particular bonus payments, particularly in larger companies, are disproportionately large compared to the performance and responsibilities of a single manager. Against this background, the article investigates the circumstances under which bonus payments for managers are judged to be just or unjust. The article draws upon theoretical approaches of organisational justice. We use data from a representative telephone survey where German workers were asked to judge hypothetical scenarios. The analyses show that respondents are more likely to accept bonuses if these can be directly attributed to the performance of the managers and if the company has a transparent information policy. In addition, moderate bonus payments are judged as being fairer. Finally, respondents seem to take into account that a company’s profits can seldom be ascribed solely to the efforts and performance of the management: The most influential factor for the evaluations of the respondents is the degree to which employees also share in firm profits.

Suggested Citation

  • Struck, Olaf & Dütsch, Matthias & Stephan, Gesine, 2016. "Bonuszahlungen an Manager. Eine Szenarienanalyse zu Gerechtigkeitsurteilen," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 69(2), pages 85-94.
  • Handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2016-2-85
    DOI: 10.5771/0342-300X-2016-2-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0342-300X-2016-2-85
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/0342-300X-2016-2-85?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2016-2-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.