IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2023i58p89-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the effectiveness of administrative-territorial transformations in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Dubrovskaya, Yu.

    (Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russia)

  • Belonogov, Yu.

    (Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russia)

  • Kozonogova, E.

    (Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russia)

Abstract

In modern studies devoted to the issues of reforming the administrative-territorial division in the present and historical past of Russia, the point of view traditionally prevails, according to which the true goal of such transformations is to create not so much an economically efficient but a state-administrative territorial framework. However, most of these judgments are not supported by empirical evidence and quantitative estimates. Therefore, modeling the problem of the conflict of managerial and economic interests during the reform of the administrative-territorial division of Russia seems to be an interesting research task. Its solution will give a new assessment of the effectiveness of administrative- territorial transformations both in historical retrospect and in modern political realities. The authors collected statistical data for 135 years for studying the evolution of the territorial organization of Russia. The value of real GDP per capita in 1913 prices was chosen as an endogenous variable. As the main variables of interest, dummy variables were used, obtained according to the authors' grouping of historical events and characterizing political and economic initiatives to change the territorial division of the country. As a result of modeling, it was proved that the transformations on the "crossroads" of the administrative borders of the regions (regardless of the declared goals) during the period under review contributed more to solving the political and managerial tasks of the Center than to the economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Dubrovskaya, Yu. & Belonogov, Yu. & Kozonogova, E., 2023. "Evaluation of the effectiveness of administrative-territorial transformations in Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 58(1), pages 89-108.
  • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2023:i:58:p:89-108
    DOI: 10.31737/22212264_2023_1_89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2023-58-89-108r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31737/22212264_2023_1_89?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markevich, Andrei & Harrison, Mark, 2011. "Great War, Civil War, and Recovery: Russia's National Income, 1913 to 1928," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 71(3), pages 672-703, September.
    2. P. A. Minakir & A. G. Isaev & A. N. Dem’yanenko & O. M. Prokapalo, 2020. "Economic Macroregions: An Integration Phenomenon or Political–Geographical Expediency? The Case of the Far East," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 327-343, July.
    3. Zemtsov, S. & Smelov, Y., 2018. "Factors of Regional Development in Russia: Geography, Human Capital and Regional Policies," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 40(4), pages 84-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrei Markevich & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2018. "The Economic Effects of the Abolition of Serfdom: Evidence from the Russian Empire," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(4-5), pages 1074-1117, April.
    2. Leandro Prados de la Escosura, 2015. "World Human Development: 1870–2007," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 61(2), pages 220-247, June.
    3. Jutta Bolt & Jan Luiten Zanden, 2014. "The Maddison Project: collaborative research on historical national accounts," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 67(3), pages 627-651, August.
    4. Broadberry, Stephen & Korchmina, Elena, 2022. "Catching-up and falling behind : Russian economic growth,1690s-1880s," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 626, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    5. Paul Castañeda Dower & Andrei Markevich, 2018. "Labor Misallocation and Mass Mobilization: Russian Agriculture during the Great War," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 100(2), pages 245-259, May.
    6. Prados de la Escosura, Leandro, 2019. "Human Development in the Age of Globalisation," CEPR Discussion Papers 13744, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Harrison, Mark, 2017. "The Soviet Economy, 1917-1991 : Its Life and Afterlife," Economic Research Papers 269309, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    8. Lindert, Peter H. & Nafziger, Steven, 2014. "Russian Inequality on the Eve of Revolution," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 74(3), pages 767-798, September.
    9. Miller, Marcus & Smith, Jennifer C., 2015. "In the shadow of the Gulag: Worker discipline under Stalin," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 531-548.
    10. Chernina, Eugenia & Castañeda Dower, Paul & Markevich, Andrei, 2014. "Property rights, land liquidity, and internal migration," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 191-215.
    11. Bessolitsyn, Alexander A. (Бессолицын, Александр), 2018. "Private Business and Revolution (on the Economic Reasons of the Events of February 1917 in Russia) [Частный Бизнес И Революция (К Вопросу Об Экономических Причинах Февраля 1917 Года В России)]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 1, pages 234-251, February.
    12. Zemtsov, S., 2021. "New technologies and regional development in the modern period," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 51(3), pages 196-207.
    13. Zemtsov, S., 2020. "Institutions, entrepreneurship, and regional development in Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 46(2), pages 168-180.
    14. Paul Castaneda Dower & Andrei Markevich, 2013. "Labor Surplus and Mass Mobilization: Russian Agriculture during the Great War," Working Papers w0196, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
    15. Hartmut Lehmann & Aleksey Oshchepkov & Maria Giulia Silvagni, 2020. "Regional Convergence In Russia: Estimating A Neoclassical Growth Model," HSE Working papers WP BRP 232/EC/2020, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    16. Michel Fouquin & Jules Hugot, 2016. "Two Centuries of Bilateral Trade and Gravity Data: 1827-2014," Working Papers 2016-14, CEPII research center.
    17. Smirnov, Sergey, 2015. "Economic Fluctuations in Russia (from the late 1920s to 2015)," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 130-153.
    18. Anton Cheremukhin & Mikhail Golosov & Sergei Guriev & Aleh Tsyvinski, 2013. "Was Stalin Necessary for Russia's Economic Development?," NBER Working Papers 19425, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. repec:cge:wacage:2018 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/382e4c7la19qb8m0mtvar753ei is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Demidova, O. & Timofeeva, E., 2021. "Spatial aspects of wage curve estimation in Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 51(3), pages 69-101.
    22. N. N. Mikheeva, 2021. "Resilience of Russian Regions to Economic Shocks," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 68-77, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic growth; administrative-t erritorial division; Center-Regions relationship system; spatial development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O2 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2023:i:58:p:89-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.