IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v488y2012i7411d10.1038_nature11347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Division and subtraction by distinct cortical inhibitory networks in vivo

Author

Listed:
  • Nathan R. Wilson

    (Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139 USA)

  • Caroline A. Runyan

    (Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139 USA)

  • Forea L. Wang

    (Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139 USA)

  • Mriganka Sur

    (Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139 USA)

Abstract

Brain circuits process information through specialized neuronal subclasses interacting within a network. Revealing their interplay requires activating specific cells while monitoring others in a functioning circuit. Here we use a new platform for two-way light-based circuit interrogation in visual cortex in vivo to show the computational implications of modulating different subclasses of inhibitory neurons during sensory processing. We find that soma-targeting, parvalbumin-expressing (PV) neurons principally divide responses but preserve stimulus selectivity, whereas dendrite-targeting, somatostatin-expressing (SOM) neurons principally subtract from excitatory responses and sharpen selectivity. Visualized in vivo cell-attached recordings show that division by PV neurons alters response gain, whereas subtraction by SOM neurons shifts response levels. Finally, stimulating identified neurons while scanning many target cells reveals that single PV and SOM neurons functionally impact only specific subsets of neurons in their projection fields. These findings provide direct evidence that inhibitory neuronal subclasses have distinct and complementary roles in cortical computations.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathan R. Wilson & Caroline A. Runyan & Forea L. Wang & Mriganka Sur, 2012. "Division and subtraction by distinct cortical inhibitory networks in vivo," Nature, Nature, vol. 488(7411), pages 343-348, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:488:y:2012:i:7411:d:10.1038_nature11347
    DOI: 10.1038/nature11347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature11347
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature11347?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sorinel A Oprisan & Xandre Clementsmith & Tamas Tompa & Antonieta Lavin, 2019. "Dopamine receptor antagonists effects on low-dimensional attractors of local field potentials in optogenetic mice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-39, October.
    2. Landry, Peter & Webb, Ryan, 2021. "Pairwise normalization: A neuroeconomic theory of multi-attribute choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Joshua H Goldwyn & Bradley R Slabe & Joseph B Travers & David Terman, 2018. "Gain control with A-type potassium current: IA as a switch between divisive and subtractive inhibition," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Christopher F. Angeloni & Wiktor MÅ‚ynarski & Eugenio Piasini & Aaron M. Williams & Katherine C. Wood & Linda Garami & Ann M. Hermundstad & Maria N. Geffen, 2023. "Dynamics of cortical contrast adaptation predict perception of signals in noise," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Bryce D. Grier & Samuel Parkins & Jarra Omar & Hey-Kyoung Lee, 2023. "Selective plasticity of fast and slow excitatory synapses on somatostatin interneurons in adult visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Tristan G. Heintz & Antonio J. Hinojosa & Sina E. Dominiak & Leon Lagnado, 2022. "Opposite forms of adaptation in mouse visual cortex are controlled by distinct inhibitory microcircuits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:488:y:2012:i:7411:d:10.1038_nature11347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.