IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v428y2004i6981d10.1038_nature02341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

General conditions for predictivity in learning theory

Author

Listed:
  • Tomaso Poggio

    (Brain Sciences Department, MIT)

  • Ryan Rifkin

    (Brain Sciences Department, MIT
    Honda Research Institute USA Inc.)

  • Sayan Mukherjee

    (Brain Sciences Department, MIT
    Center for Genome Research/Whitehead Institute, MIT)

  • Partha Niyogi

    (University of Chicago)

Abstract

Developing theoretical foundations for learning is a key step towards understanding intelligence. ‘Learning from examples’ is a paradigm in which systems (natural or artificial) learn a functional relationship from a training set of examples. Within this paradigm, a learning algorithm is a map from the space of training sets to the hypothesis space of possible functional solutions. A central question for the theory is to determine conditions under which a learning algorithm will generalize from its finite training set to novel examples. A milestone in learning theory1,2,3,4,5 was a characterization of conditions on the hypothesis space that ensure generalization for the natural class of empirical risk minimization (ERM) learning algorithms that are based on minimizing the error on the training set. Here we provide conditions for generalization in terms of a precise stability property of the learning process: when the training set is perturbed by deleting one example, the learned hypothesis does not change much. This stability property stipulates conditions on the learning map rather than on the hypothesis space, subsumes the classical theory for ERM algorithms, and is applicable to more general algorithms. The surprising connection between stability and predictivity has implications for the foundations of learning theory and for the design of novel algorithms, and provides insights into problems as diverse as language learning and inverse problems in physics and engineering.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomaso Poggio & Ryan Rifkin & Sayan Mukherjee & Partha Niyogi, 2004. "General conditions for predictivity in learning theory," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6981), pages 419-422, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:428:y:2004:i:6981:d:10.1038_nature02341
    DOI: 10.1038/nature02341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature02341
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature02341?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christmann, Andreas & Steinwart, Ingo, 2005. "Consistency and robustness of kernel based regression," Technical Reports 2005,01, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    2. Brighton, Henry & Gigerenzer, Gerd, 2015. "The bias bias," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(8), pages 1772-1784.
    3. Debruyne, Michiel & Christmann, Andreas & Hubert, Mia & Suykens, Johan A.K., 2010. "Robustness of reweighted Least Squares Kernel Based Regression," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 447-463, February.
    4. Duo Qin, 2022. "Redirect the Probability Approach in Econometrics Towards PAC Learning," Working Papers 249, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:428:y:2004:i:6981:d:10.1038_nature02341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.