IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v5y2022i1d10.1038_s41893-021-00803-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping the irrecoverable carbon in Earth’s ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Monica L. Noon

    (Conservation International)

  • Allie Goldstein

    (Conservation International)

  • Juan Carlos Ledezma

    (Conservation International)

  • Patrick R. Roehrdanz

    (Conservation International)

  • Susan C. Cook-Patton

    (The Nature Conservancy)

  • Seth A. Spawn-Lee

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison
    University of Wisconsin-Madison)

  • Timothy Maxwell Wright

    (Conservation International)

  • Mariano Gonzalez-Roglich

    (Wildlife Conservation Society)

  • David G. Hole

    (Conservation International)

  • Johan Rockström

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Telegrafenberg)

  • Will R. Turner

    (Conservation International)

Abstract

Avoiding catastrophic climate change requires rapid decarbonization and improved ecosystem stewardship at a planetary scale. The carbon released through the burning of fossil fuels would take millennia to regenerate on Earth. Though the timeframe of carbon recovery for ecosystems such as peatlands, mangroves and old-growth forests is shorter (centuries), this timeframe still exceeds the time we have remaining to avoid the worst impacts of global warming. There are some natural places that we cannot afford to lose due to their irreplaceable carbon reserves. Here we map ‘irrecoverable carbon’ globally to identify ecosystem carbon that remains within human purview to manage and, if lost, could not be recovered by mid-century, by when we need to reach net-zero emissions to avoid the worst climate impacts. Since 2010, agriculture, logging and wildfire have caused emissions of at least 4.0 Gt of irrecoverable carbon. The world’s remaining 139.1 ± 443.6 Gt of irrecoverable carbon faces risks from land-use conversion and climate change. These risks can be reduced through proactive protection and adaptive management. Currently, 23.0% of irrecoverable carbon is within protected areas and 33.6% is managed by Indigenous peoples and local communities. Half of Earth’s irrecoverable carbon is concentrated on just 3.3% of its land, highlighting opportunities for targeted efforts to increase global climate security.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica L. Noon & Allie Goldstein & Juan Carlos Ledezma & Patrick R. Roehrdanz & Susan C. Cook-Patton & Seth A. Spawn-Lee & Timothy Maxwell Wright & Mariano Gonzalez-Roglich & David G. Hole & Johan Roc, 2022. "Mapping the irrecoverable carbon in Earth’s ecosystems," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 37-46, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:5:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41893-021-00803-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-021-00803-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-021-00803-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-021-00803-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan C. Cook-Patton & Sara M. Leavitt & David Gibbs & Nancy L. Harris & Kristine Lister & Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira & Russell D. Briggs & Robin L. Chazdon & Thomas W. Crowther & Peter W. Ellis & , 2020. "Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth," Nature, Nature, vol. 585(7826), pages 545-550, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing Zhao & Hui Hu & Jinglei Wang, 2022. "Forest Carbon Reserve Calculation and Comprehensive Economic Value Evaluation: A Forest Management Model Based on Both Biomass Expansion Factor Method and Total Forest Value," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Yangjian Zhang & Li Wang & Quan Zhou & Feng Tang & Bo Zhang & Ni Huang & Biswajit Nath, 2022. "Continuous Change Detection and Classification—Spectral Trajectory Breakpoint Recognition for Forest Monitoring," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Robin R. Sears & Manuel R. Guariguata & Peter Cronkleton & Cristina Miranda Beas, 2021. "Strengthening Local Governance of Secondary Forest in Peru," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Qiming Zheng & Tim Ha & Alexander V. Prishchepov & Yiwen Zeng & He Yin & Lian Pin Koh, 2023. "The neglected role of abandoned cropland in supporting both food security and climate change mitigation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Susan C. Cook-Patton & C. Ronnie Drever & Bronson W. Griscom & Kelley Hamrick & Hamilton Hardman & Timm Kroeger & Pablo Pacheco & Shyla Raghav & Martha Stevenson & Chris Webb & Samantha Yeo & Peter W., 2021. "Protect, manage and then restore lands for climate mitigation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(12), pages 1027-1034, December.
    6. Jacob J. Bukoski & Susan C. Cook-Patton & Cyril Melikov & Hongyi Ban & Jessica L. Chen & Elizabeth D. Goldman & Nancy L. Harris & Matthew D. Potts, 2022. "Rates and drivers of aboveground carbon accumulation in global monoculture plantation forests," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Chu, Long & Grafton, R. Quentin & Nguyen, Hai, 2022. "A global analysis of the break-even prices to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide via forest plantation and avoided deforestation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. Zhen Yu & Shirong Liu & Haikui Li & Jingjing Liang & Weiguo Liu & Shilong Piao & Hanqin Tian & Guoyi Zhou & Chaoqun Lu & Weibin You & Pengsen Sun & Yanli Dong & Stephen Sitch & Evgenios Agathokleous, 2024. "Maximizing carbon sequestration potential in Chinese forests through optimal management," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Natalia Hasler & Christopher A. Williams & Vanessa Carrasco Denney & Peter W. Ellis & Surendra Shrestha & Drew E. Terasaki Hart & Nicholas H. Wolff & Samantha Yeo & Thomas W. Crowther & Leland K. Werd, 2024. "Accounting for albedo change to identify climate-positive tree cover restoration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:5:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41893-021-00803-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.