IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v3y2020i9d10.1038_s41893-020-0557-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divergent responses of soil organic carbon to afforestation

Author

Listed:
  • Songbai Hong

    (Peking University)

  • Guodong Yin

    (Peking University
    Beijing Normal University)

  • Shilong Piao

    (Peking University
    Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Ray Dybzinski

    (Loyola University Chicago)

  • Nan Cong

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Xiangyi Li

    (Peking University)

  • Kai Wang

    (Peking University)

  • Josep Peñuelas

    (CREAF
    Global Ecology Unit CREAF-CSIC-UAB)

  • Hui Zeng

    (Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School)

  • Anping Chen

    (Colorado State University)

Abstract

Large-scale afforestation is regarded as an effective natural climate solution. However, afforestation-induced changes in soil organic C (SOC) are poorly quantified due to the paucity of large-scale sampling data. Here, we provide the first comprehensive assessment of the afforestation impact on SOC stocks with a pairwise comparative study of samples from 619 control-and-afforested plot pairs in northern China. We found context-dependent effects of afforestation on SOC: afforestation increases SOC density (SOCD) in C-poor soils but decreases SOCD in C-rich soils, especially in deeper soil. Thus, the fixed biomass/SOC ratio assumed in previous studies could overestimate the SOC enhancement by afforestation. By extrapolating the sampling data to the entire region, we estimate that afforestation increased SOC stocks in northern China by only 234.9 ± 9.6 TgC over the last three decades. The study highlights the importance of including pre-afforestation soil properties in models of soil carbon dynamics and carbon sink projections.

Suggested Citation

  • Songbai Hong & Guodong Yin & Shilong Piao & Ray Dybzinski & Nan Cong & Xiangyi Li & Kai Wang & Josep Peñuelas & Hui Zeng & Anping Chen, 2020. "Divergent responses of soil organic carbon to afforestation," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(9), pages 694-700, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:3:y:2020:i:9:d:10.1038_s41893-020-0557-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-020-0557-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-020-0557-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-020-0557-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Silvina M. Manrique & Judith Franco, 2020. "Tree cover increase mitigation strategy: implications of the “replacement approach” in carbon storage of a subtropical ecosystem," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 1481-1508, December.
    2. Songbai Hong & Jinzhi Ding & Fei Kan & Hao Xu & Shaoyuan Chen & Yitong Yao & Shilong Piao, 2023. "Asymmetry of carbon sequestrations by plant and soil after forestation regulated by soil nitrogen," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Shanshan Song & Yali Ding & Wei Li & Yuchen Meng & Jian Zhou & Ruikun Gou & Conghe Zhang & Shengbin Ye & Neil Saintilan & Ken W. Krauss & Stephen Crooks & Shuguo Lv & Guanghui Lin, 2023. "Mangrove reforestation provides greater blue carbon benefit than afforestation for mitigating global climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Yunpeng Zhao & Chengzhu Liu & Xingqi Li & Lixiao Ma & Guoqing Zhai & Xiaojuan Feng, 2023. "Sphagnum increases soil’s sequestration capacity of mineral-associated organic carbon via activating metal oxides," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:3:y:2020:i:9:d:10.1038_s41893-020-0557-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.