IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v1y2017i12d10.1038_s41562-017-0242-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging cultural sociology and cognitive psychology in three contemporary research programmes

Author

Listed:
  • Michèle Lamont

    (Harvard University
    Canadian Institute for Advanced Research)

  • Laura Adler

    (Harvard University)

  • Bo Yun Park

    (Harvard University)

  • Xin Xiang

    (Harvard University)

Abstract

Three prominent research programmes in cognitive psychology would benefit from a stronger engagement with the cultural context of cognition: studies of poverty focused on scarcity and cognitive bandwidth, studies of dual-process morality and studies of biases using the implicit association test. We address some limitations of these programmes and suggest research strategies for moving beyond an exclusive focus on cognition. Research on poverty using the cognitive bandwidth approach would benefit from considering the cultural schemas that influence how people perceive and prioritize needs. Dual-process morality researchers could explain variation by analysing cultural repertoires that structure moral choices. Research using the implicit association test can better explain implicit attitudes by addressing the variability in cultural schemas that undergird biases. We identify how these research programmes can deepen the causal understanding of human attitudes and behaviours by addressing the interaction between internal cognition and supra-individual cultural repertoires.

Suggested Citation

  • Michèle Lamont & Laura Adler & Bo Yun Park & Xin Xiang, 2017. "Bridging cultural sociology and cognitive psychology in three contemporary research programmes," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(12), pages 866-872, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:1:y:2017:i:12:d:10.1038_s41562-017-0242-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0242-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0242-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-017-0242-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benjamin Ambuehl & Jennifer Inauen, 2022. "Contextualized Measurement Scale Adaptation: A 4-Step Tutorial for Health Psychology Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Bennouna, Cyril & Gillespie, Alli & Stark, Lindsay & Seff, Ilana, 2022. "Norms, Repertoires, & Intersections: Towards an integrated theory of culture for health research and practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    3. Mauricio Salgado & Alejandra Vásquez & Alejandra Yáñez, 2019. "Do Young People Adapt Their Prosocial Behaviour to That of Their Peers? An Experimental Exploration," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(3), pages 332-352, September.
    4. Paul B. Hutchings & Katie E. Sullivan, 2019. "Prejudice and the Brexit vote: a tangled web," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-5, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:1:y:2017:i:12:d:10.1038_s41562-017-0242-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.