IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v14y2023i1d10.1038_s41467-023-43661-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

True prevalence of long-COVID in a nationwide, population cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Claire E. Hastie

    (University of Glasgow)

  • David J. Lowe

    (University of Glasgow
    Queen Elizabeth University Hospital)

  • Andrew McAuley

    (Public Health Scotland, Meridian Court
    Glasgow Caledonian University)

  • Nicholas L. Mills

    (University of Edinburgh
    University of Edinburgh)

  • Andrew J. Winter

    (Sandyford Sexual Health Services, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde)

  • Corri Black

    (University of Aberdeen
    Public Health Directorate, NHS Grampian)

  • Janet T. Scott

    (University of Glasgow)

  • Catherine A. O’Donnell

    (University of Glasgow)

  • David N. Blane

    (University of Glasgow)

  • Susan Browne

    (University of Glasgow)

  • Tracy R. Ibbotson

    (University of Glasgow)

  • Jill P. Pell

    (University of Glasgow)

Abstract

Long-COVID prevalence estimates vary widely and should take account of symptoms that would have occurred anyway. Here we determine the prevalence of symptoms attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection, taking account of background rates and confounding, in a nationwide population cohort study of 198,096 Scottish adults. 98,666 (49.8%) had symptomatic laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and 99,430 (50.2%) were age-, sex-, and socioeconomically-matched and never-infected. While 41,775 (64.5%) reported at least one symptom 6 months following SARS-CoV-2 infection, this was also true of 34,600 (50.8%) of those never-infected. The crude prevalence of one or more symptom attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection was 13.8% (13.2%,14.3%), 12.8% (11.9%,13.6%), and 16.3% (14.4%,18.2%) at 6, 12, and 18 months respectively. Following adjustment for potential confounders, these figures were 6.6% (6.3%, 6.9%), 6.5% (6.0%, 6.9%) and 10.4% (9.1%, 11.6%) respectively. Long-COVID is characterised by a wide range of symptoms that, apart from altered taste and smell, are non-specific. Care should be taken in attributing symptoms to previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Suggested Citation

  • Claire E. Hastie & David J. Lowe & Andrew McAuley & Nicholas L. Mills & Andrew J. Winter & Corri Black & Janet T. Scott & Catherine A. O’Donnell & David N. Blane & Susan Browne & Tracy R. Ibbotson & J, 2023. "True prevalence of long-COVID in a nationwide, population cohort study," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-6, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-43661-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43661-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-43661-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-023-43661-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karin Magnusson & Doris Tove Kristoffersen & Andrea Dell’Isola & Ali Kiadaliri & Aleksandra Turkiewicz & Jos Runhaar & Sita Bierma-Zeinstra & Martin Englund & Per Minor Magnus & Jonas Minet Kinge, 2022. "Post-covid medical complaints following infection with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron vs Delta variants," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Min Du & Yirui Ma & Jie Deng & Min Liu & Jue Liu, 2022. "Comparison of Long COVID-19 Caused by Different SARS-CoV-2 Strains: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacqueline A. Krysa & Sidney Horlick & Kiran Pohar Manhas & Katharina Kovacs Burns & Mikayla Buell & Maria J. Santana & Kristine Russell & Elizabeth Papathanassoglou & Chester Ho, 2023. "Accessing Care Services for Long COVID Sufferers in Alberta, Canada: A Random, Cross-Sectional Survey Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Kristin Kostka & Elena Roel & Nhung T. H. Trinh & Núria Mercadé-Besora & Antonella Delmestri & Lourdes Mateu & Roger Paredes & Talita Duarte-Salles & Daniel Prieto-Alhambra & Martí Català & Annika M. , 2023. "The burden of post-acute COVID-19 symptoms in a multinational network cohort analysis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. B-A. Reme & J. Gjesvik & K. Magnusson, 2023. "Predictors of the post-COVID condition following mild SARS-CoV-2 infection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Christina J. Atchison & Bethan Davies & Emily Cooper & Adam Lound & Matthew Whitaker & Adam Hampshire & Adriana Azor & Christl A. Donnelly & Marc Chadeau-Hyam & Graham S. Cooke & Helen Ward & Paul Ell, 2023. "Long-term health impacts of COVID-19 among 242,712 adults in England," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Weipeng Fang & Changwei Qin & Dan Zhou & Jian Yin & Zhongmin Liu & Xianjun Guan, 2023. "The Impact of Cooperative Behavior between Social Organizations during the COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak in Shanghai: A Simulation Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-12, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-43661-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.