IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-27285-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The biogenesis and function of nucleosome arrays

Author

Listed:
  • Ashish Kumar Singh

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)

  • Tamás Schauer

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)

  • Lena Pfaller

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
    Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research)

  • Tobias Straub

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)

  • Felix Mueller-Planitz

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
    Technische Universität Dresden)

Abstract

Numerous chromatin remodeling enzymes position nucleosomes in eukaryotic cells. Aside from these factors, transcription, DNA sequence, and statistical positioning of nucleosomes also shape the nucleosome landscape. The precise contributions of these processes remain unclear due to their functional redundancy in vivo. By incisive genome engineering, we radically decreased their redundancy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The transcriptional machinery strongly disrupts evenly spaced nucleosomes. Proper nucleosome density and DNA sequence are critical for their biogenesis. The INO80 remodeling complex helps space nucleosomes in vivo and positions the first nucleosome over genes in an H2A.Z-independent fashion. INO80 requires its Arp8 subunit but unexpectedly not the Nhp10 module for spacing. Cells with irregularly spaced nucleosomes suffer from genotoxic stress including DNA damage, recombination and transpositions. We derive a model of the biogenesis of the nucleosome landscape and suggest that it evolved not only to regulate but also to protect the genome.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashish Kumar Singh & Tamás Schauer & Lena Pfaller & Tobias Straub & Felix Mueller-Planitz, 2021. "The biogenesis and function of nucleosome arrays," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-27285-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27285-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-27285-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-27285-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandipan Brahma & Mzwanele Ngubo & Somnath Paul & Maheshi Udugama & Blaine Bartholomew, 2018. "The Arp8 and Arp4 module acts as a DNA sensor controlling INO80 chromatin remodeling," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Shinya Watanabe & Dongyan Tan & Mahadevan Lakshminarasimhan & Michael P. Washburn & Eun-Jin Erica Hong & Thomas Walz & Craig L. Peterson, 2015. "Structural analyses of the chromatin remodelling enzymes INO80-C and SWR-C," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-10, November.
    3. Elisa Oberbeckmann & Vanessa Niebauer & Shinya Watanabe & Lucas Farnung & Manuela Moldt & Andrea Schmid & Patrick Cramer & Craig L. Peterson & Sebastian Eustermann & Karl-Peter Hopfner & Philipp Korbe, 2021. "Ruler elements in chromatin remodelers set nucleosome array spacing and phasing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Kazuhiro Yamada & Timothy D. Frouws & Brigitte Angst & Daniel J. Fitzgerald & Carl DeLuca & Kyoko Schimmele & David F. Sargent & Timothy J. Richmond, 2011. "Structure and mechanism of the chromatin remodelling factor ISW1a," Nature, Nature, vol. 472(7344), pages 448-453, April.
    5. Sebastian Eustermann & Kevin Schall & Dirk Kostrewa & Kristina Lakomek & Mike Strauss & Manuela Moldt & Karl-Peter Hopfner, 2018. "Structural basis for ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling by the INO80 complex," Nature, Nature, vol. 556(7701), pages 386-390, April.
    6. Eleni P. Mimitou & Lorraine S. Symington, 2008. "Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing," Nature, Nature, vol. 455(7214), pages 770-774, October.
    7. William H. Gittens & Dominic J. Johnson & Rachal M. Allison & Tim J. Cooper & Holly Thomas & Matthew J. Neale, 2019. "A nucleotide resolution map of Top2-linked DNA breaks in the yeast and human genome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Sandipan Brahma & Maheshi I. Udugama & Jongseong Kim & Arjan Hada & Saurabh K. Bhardwaj & Solomon G. Hailu & Tae-Hee Lee & Blaine Bartholomew, 2017. "INO80 exchanges H2A.Z for H2A by translocating on DNA proximal to histone dimers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vera M. Kissling & Giordano Reginato & Eliana Bianco & Kristina Kasaciunaite & Janny Tilma & Gea Cereghetti & Natalie Schindler & Sung Sik Lee & Raphaël Guérois & Brian Luke & Ralf Seidel & Petr Cejka, 2022. "Mre11-Rad50 oligomerization promotes DNA double-strand break repair," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Erica J. Polleys & Isabella Priore & James E. Haber & Catherine H. Freudenreich, 2023. "Structure-forming CAG/CTG repeats interfere with gap repair to cause repeat expansions and chromosome breaks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Li Wang & Jiali Yu & Zishuo Yu & Qianmin Wang & Wanjun Li & Yulei Ren & Zhenguo Chen & Shuang He & Yanhui Xu, 2022. "Structure of nucleosome-bound human PBAF complex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Lorenzo Galanti & Martina Peritore & Robert Gnügge & Elda Cannavo & Johannes Heipke & Maria Dilia Palumbieri & Barbara Steigenberger & Lorraine S. Symington & Petr Cejka & Boris Pfander, 2024. "Dbf4-dependent kinase promotes cell cycle controlled resection of DNA double-strand breaks and repair by homologous recombination," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Sofía Muñoz & Andrew Jones & Céline Bouchoux & Tegan Gilmore & Harshil Patel & Frank Uhlmann, 2022. "Functional crosstalk between the cohesin loader and chromatin remodelers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Adrián Campos & Facundo Ramos & Lydia Iglesias & Celia Delgado & Eva Merino & Antonio Esperilla-Muñoz & Jaime Correa-Bordes & Andrés Clemente-Blanco, 2023. "Cdc14 phosphatase counteracts Cdk-dependent Dna2 phosphorylation to inhibit resection during recombinational DNA repair," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Priya Kapoor-Vazirani & Sandip K. Rath & Xu Liu & Zhen Shu & Nicole E. Bowen & Yitong Chen & Ramona Haji-Seyed-Javadi & Waaqo Daddacha & Elizabeth V. Minten & Diana Danelia & Daniela Farchi & Duc M. D, 2022. "SAMHD1 deacetylation by SIRT1 promotes DNA end resection by facilitating DNA binding at double-strand breaks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Melissa S Gildenberg & M Todd Washington, 2019. "Conformational flexibility of fork-remodeling helicase Rad5 shown by full-ensemble hybrid methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Ziqing Yang & Shaomin Zou & Yijing Zhang & Jieping Zhang & Peng Zhang & Lishi Xiao & Yunling Xie & Manqi Meng & Junyan Feng & Liang Kang & Mong-Hong Lee & Lekun Fang, 2023. "ACTL6A protects gastric cancer cells against ferroptosis through induction of glutathione synthesis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-27285-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.