IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-26628-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Temporal inhibition of chromatin looping and enhancer accessibility during neuronal remodeling

Author

Listed:
  • Dahong Chen

    (Nuclear Organization and Gene Expression Section
    Laboratory of Biochemistry and Genetics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health)

  • Catherine E. McManus

    (Nuclear Organization and Gene Expression Section
    Laboratory of Biochemistry and Genetics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health)

  • Behram Radmanesh

    (Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health)

  • Leah H. Matzat

    (Nuclear Organization and Gene Expression Section
    Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health)

  • Elissa P. Lei

    (Nuclear Organization and Gene Expression Section
    Laboratory of Biochemistry and Genetics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health)

Abstract

During development, looping of an enhancer to a promoter is frequently observed in conjunction with temporal and tissue-specific transcriptional activation. The chromatin insulator-associated protein Alan Shepard (Shep) promotes Drosophila post-mitotic neuronal remodeling by repressing transcription of master developmental regulators, such as brain tumor (brat), specifically in maturing neurons. Since insulator proteins can promote looping, we hypothesized that Shep antagonizes brat promoter interaction with an as yet unidentified enhancer. Using chromatin conformation capture and reporter assays, we identified two enhancer regions that increase in looping frequency with the brat promoter specifically in pupal brains after Shep depletion. The brat promoters and enhancers function independently of Shep, ruling out direct repression of these elements. Moreover, ATAC-seq in isolated neurons demonstrates that Shep restricts chromatin accessibility of a key brat enhancer as well as other enhancers genome-wide in remodeling pupal but not larval neurons. These enhancers are enriched for chromatin targets of Shep and are located at Shep-inhibited genes, suggesting direct Shep inhibition of enhancer accessibility and gene expression during neuronal remodeling. Our results provide evidence for temporal regulation of chromatin looping and enhancer accessibility during neuronal maturation.

Suggested Citation

  • Dahong Chen & Catherine E. McManus & Behram Radmanesh & Leah H. Matzat & Elissa P. Lei, 2021. "Temporal inhibition of chromatin looping and enhancer accessibility during neuronal remodeling," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26628-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26628-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26628-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-26628-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yad Ghavi-Helm & Felix A. Klein & Tibor Pakozdi & Lucia Ciglar & Daan Noordermeer & Wolfgang Huber & Eileen E. M. Furlong, 2014. "Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase," Nature, Nature, vol. 512(7512), pages 96-100, August.
    2. Susan E. Celniker & Laura A. L. Dillon & Mark B. Gerstein & Kristin C. Gunsalus & Steven Henikoff & Gary H. Karpen & Manolis Kellis & Eric C. Lai & Jason D. Lieb & David M. MacAlpine & Gos Micklem & F, 2009. "Unlocking the secrets of the genome," Nature, Nature, vol. 459(7249), pages 927-930, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xingting Guo & Chenhui Wang & Yongchao Zhang & Ruxue Wei & Rongwen Xi, 2024. "Cell-fate conversion of intestinal cells in adult Drosophila midgut by depleting a single transcription factor," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dafne Ibarra-Morales & Michael Rauer & Piergiuseppe Quarato & Leily Rabbani & Fides Zenk & Mariana Schulte-Sasse & Francesco Cardamone & Alejandro Gomez-Auli & Germano Cecere & Nicola Iovino, 2021. "Histone variant H2A.Z regulates zygotic genome activation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Shijia Zhu & Guohua Wang & Bo Liu & Yadong Wang, 2013. "Modeling Exon Expression Using Histone Modifications," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Joyce J. Thompson & Daniel J. Lee & Apratim Mitra & Sarah Frail & Ryan K. Dale & Pedro P. Rocha, 2022. "Extensive co-binding and rapid redistribution of NANOG and GATA6 during emergence of divergent lineages," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Hao Wu & Hongkai Ji, 2014. "PolyaPeak: Detecting Transcription Factor Binding Sites from ChIP-seq Using Peak Shape Information," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-9, March.
    5. Maëlle Bellec & Jérémy Dufourt & George Hunt & Hélène Lenden-Hasse & Antonio Trullo & Amal Zine El Aabidine & Marie Lamarque & Marissa M. Gaskill & Heloïse Faure-Gautron & Mattias Mannervik & Melissa , 2022. "The control of transcriptional memory by stable mitotic bookmarking," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Xinhao Hou & Mingjing Xu & Chengming Zhu & Jianing Gao & Meili Li & Xiangyang Chen & Cheng Sun & Björn Nashan & Jianye Zang & Ying Zhou & Shouhong Guang & Xuezhu Feng, 2023. "Systematic characterization of chromodomain proteins reveals an H3K9me1/2 reader regulating aging in C. elegans," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Yayoi Natsume-Kitatani & Hiroshi Mamitsuka, 2016. "Classification of Promoters Based on the Combination of Core Promoter Elements Exhibits Different Histone Modification Patterns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Jingyao Wang & Shihe Zhang & Hongfang Lu & Heng Xu, 2022. "Differential regulation of alternative promoters emerges from unified kinetics of enhancer-promoter interaction," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Jingting Xu & Hong Hu & Yang Dai, 2016. "LMethyR-SVM: Predict Human Enhancers Using Low Methylated Regions based on Weighted Support Vector Machines," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Vivekanandan Ramalingam & Xinyang Yu & Brian D. Slaughter & Jay R. Unruh & Kaelan J. Brennan & Anastasiia Onyshchenko & Jeffrey J. Lange & Malini Natarajan & Michael Buck & Julia Zeitlinger, 2023. "Lola-I is a promoter pioneer factor that establishes de novo Pol II pausing during development," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Annkatrin Bressin & Olga Jasnovidova & Mirjam Arnold & Elisabeth Altendorfer & Filip Trajkovski & Thomas A. Kratz & Joanna E. Handzlik & Denes Hnisz & Andreas Mayer, 2023. "High-sensitive nascent transcript sequencing reveals BRD4-specific control of widespread enhancer and target gene transcription," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Christopher T. Rhodes & Joyce J. Thompson & Apratim Mitra & Dhanya Asokumar & Dongjin R. Lee & Daniel J. Lee & Yajun Zhang & Eva Jason & Ryan K. Dale & Pedro P. Rocha & Timothy J. Petros, 2022. "An epigenome atlas of neural progenitors within the embryonic mouse forebrain," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26628-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.