Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Elias Bouacida & Renaud Foucart, 2020. "The acceptability of lotteries in allocation problems," Working Papers 301646245, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
- Chiara Franzoni & Paula Stephan & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2022.
"Funding Risky Research,"
Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 103-133.
- Chiara Franzoni & Paula Stephan & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2021. "Funding Risky Research," NBER Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, volume 1, pages 103-133, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Chiara Franzoni & Paula Stephan & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2021. "Funding Risky Research," NBER Working Papers 28905, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- van Dalen, Hendrik Peter, 2020.
"How the Publish-or-Perish Principle Divides a Science : The Case of Academic Economists,"
Discussion Paper
2020-020, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
- van Dalen, Hendrik Peter, 2020. "How the Publish-or-Perish Principle Divides a Science : The Case of Academic Economists," Other publications TiSEM 6fbb6b92-0e06-4271-b6e7-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Paulina Kubera & Weronika Kwiatkowska, 2021. "Challenges Related to the Implementation of State Aid Measures for Entrepreneurs Affected by the Covid-19 Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 5), pages 209-220.
- Feliciani, Thomas & Morreau, Michael & Luo, Junwen & Lucas, Pablo & Shankar, Kalpana, 2022. "Designing grant-review panels for better funding decisions: Lessons from an empirically calibrated simulation model," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
- Cruz-Castro, Laura & Sanz-Menendez, Luis, 2021. "What should be rewarded? Gender and evaluation criteria for tenure and promotion," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
- Miriam L E Steiner Davis & Tiffani R Conner & Kate Miller-Bains & Leslie Shapard, 2020. "What makes an effective grants peer reviewer? An exploratory study of the necessary skills," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, May.
- Elise S. Brezis & Aliaksandr Birukou, 2020.
"Arbitrariness in the peer review process,"
Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(1), pages 393-411, April.
- Elise S. Brezis & Aliaksandr Birukou, 2019. "Arbitrariness in the Peer Review Process," Working Papers 2019-08, Bar-Ilan University, Department of Economics.
- Ginther, Donna K. & Heggeness, Misty L., 2020. "Administrative discretion in scientific funding: Evidence from a prestigious postdoctoral training program✰," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(4).
- José Luis Ortega, 2022. "Classification and analysis of PubPeer comments: How a web journal club is used," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(5), pages 655-670, May.
- Pierre Azoulay & Danielle Li, 2020. "Scientific Grant Funding," NBER Chapters, in: Innovation and Public Policy, pages 117-150, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Rovetta, Alessandro & Castaldo, Lucia, 2022. "Are We Sure We Fully Understand What an Infodemic Is? A Global Perspective on Infodemiological Problems," SocArXiv xw723, Center for Open Science.
- Donna K. Ginther & Misty L. Heggeness, 2020. "Administrative Discretion in Scientific Funding: Evidence from a Prestigious Postdoctoral Training Program," NBER Working Papers 26841, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Gregoire Mariethoz & Frédéric Herman & Amelie Dreiss, 2021. "Reply to the comment by Heyard et al. titled “Imaginary carrot or effective fertiliser? A rejoinder on funding and productivity”," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(11), pages 9339-9342, November.
- Kevin Gross & Carl T Bergstrom, 2019. "Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, January.
- Elena A. Erosheva & Patrícia Martinková & Carole J. Lee, 2021. "When zero may not be zero: A cautionary note on the use of inter‐rater reliability in evaluating grant peer review," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(3), pages 904-919, July.
- Sven E. Hug & Mirjam Aeschbach, 2020. "Criteria for assessing grant applications: a systematic review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
- John Jerrim, 2019. "Peer-review of grant proposals. An analysis of Economic and Social Research Council grant applications," DoQSS Working Papers 19-05, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
- Elias Bouacida & Renaud Foucart, 2022. "Rituals of Reason," Working Papers 344119591, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
- Pierre Azoulay & Danielle Li, 2020. "Scientific Grant Funding," NBER Working Papers 26889, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
More about this item
Keywords
peer review; social sciences; interrater reliability; linear mixed-effects models;All these keywords.
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:115:y:2018:p:2952-2957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.