IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mup/actaun/actaun_2012060040121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate performance indicators for agriculture and food processing sector

Author

Listed:
  • Jiří Hřebíček

    (Ústav informatiky, Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Česká republika)

  • Ondřej Popelka

    (Ústav informatiky, Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Česká republika)

  • Michael Štencl

    (Ústav informatiky, Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Česká republika)

  • Oldřich Trenz

    (Ústav informatiky, Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Česká republika)

Abstract

The research project: "Construction of Methods for Multi-factorial Assessment of Company Complex Performance in Selected Sectors", solved by author team, is introduced. Current trends of corporate performance evaluation (i.e. measurement of environmental, social, economic and governance (ESG) performance) and corporate sustainable reporting are discussed in the paper focused to agriculture and food processing sector. The relationship between environmental and sustainability indicators and corporate sustainability reporting is an important issue; and the development of advanced methods to identify key performance indicators for ESG performance is discussed here along with the possibility of the utilization of information and communication technology and XBRL taxonomy evaluating applications for the creation of business performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiří Hřebíček & Ondřej Popelka & Michael Štencl & Oldřich Trenz, 2012. "Corporate performance indicators for agriculture and food processing sector," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(4), pages 121-132.
    • Handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2012060040121
    DOI: 10.11118/actaun201260040121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201260040121.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201260040121.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.11118/actaun201260040121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michal Struk & Jana Soukopová, 2011. "Efficiency of the current municipal waste expenditure - methodology approach and its application," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 59(7), pages 379-386.
    2. Stefan Schaltegger & Marcus Wagner, 2006. "Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting," International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19.
    3. Alexander Bassen & Ana Maria Kovács, 2008. "Environmental, Social and Governance Key Performance - Indicators from a Capital Market Perspective," Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik - Journal for Business, Economics & Ethics, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 9(2), pages 182-192.
    4. Sanjeev Bhojraj & Partha Sengupta, 2003. "Effect of Corporate Governance on Bond Ratings and Yields: The Role of Institutional Investors and Outside Directors," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 76(3), pages 455-476, July.
    5. Michal Hodinka & Michaela Štencl & Jiří Hřebíček & Oldřich Trenz, 2012. "Current trends of corporate performance reporting tools and methodology design of multifactor measurement of company overall performance," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(2), pages 85-90.
    6. Francesco Perrini & Antonio Tencati, 2006. "Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 296-308, September.
    7. Alexander Bassen & Ana Maria Kovács, 2008. "Environmental, Social and Governance Key Performance - Indicators from a Capital Market Perspective," Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik - Journal for Business, Economics & Ethics, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 9(2), pages 182-192.
    8. Jiří Hřebíček & Jana Soukopová & Michael Štencl & Oldřich Trenz, 2011. "Corporate key performance indicators for environmental management and reporting," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 59(2), pages 99-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iveta Šimberová & Alena Kocmanová, 2012. "Corporate governance - research of key indicators on market of processing industry in the Czech Republic via cluster analysis," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(7), pages 359-368.
    2. Jiří Hřebíček & Oldřich Faldík & Edward Kasem & Oldřich Trenz, 2015. "Determinants of Sustainability Reporting in Food and Agriculture Sectors," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 63(2), pages 539-552.
    3. Petr Petera & Jaroslav Wagner & Kateřina Knorová, 2016. "Perception and Interpretation of Sustainability Among the Largest Corporations Established in the Czech Republic," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(3), pages 1053-1065.
    4. Fontip Leesatapornwongsa & Natcha Thawesaengskulthai & Ronnakorn Vaiyavuth, 2023. "Developing a Sustainability Measurement for Innovation Performance for the Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Zuzana Chvátalová & Iveta Šimberová, 2012. "Analysis and identification of joint performance measurement indicators: social and corporate governance issues," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(7), pages 127-138.
    6. Jansky, Jaroslav & Polackova, Jana & Kozakova, Petra, 2012. "Methodological Approaches to Costs Evaluation of Canned Feed," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 4(4), December.
    7. Zuzana Chvátalová & Iveta Šimberová, 2013. "Analysis of ESG indicators for measuring enterprise performance," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(7), pages 2197-2204.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiří Hřebíček & Jana Soukopová & Michael Štencl & Oldřich Trenz, 2011. "Integration of economic, environmental, social and corporate governance performance and reporting in enterprises," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 59(7), pages 157-166.
    2. Marie Dočekalová, 2013. "Construction of corporate social performance indicators for Czech manufacturing industry," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(2), pages 309-315.
    3. Jiří Hřebíček & Oldřich Trenz & Eliška Vernerová, 2013. "Optimal set of agri-environmental indicators for the agricultural sector of Czech Republic," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(7), pages 2171-2181.
    4. Zuzana Chvátalová & Iveta Šimberová, 2012. "Analysis and identification of joint performance measurement indicators: social and corporate governance issues," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(7), pages 127-138.
    5. Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Saeid Homayoun, 2020. "Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Preeti Sharma & Priyanka Panday & R. C. Dangwal, 2020. "Determinants of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) disclosure: a study of Indian companies," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 208-217, December.
    7. Chavatip Chindavijak & Kongkiti Phusavat & Pekka Kess & Suparerk Sooksamarn, 2016. "Transformation to Enterprise Sustainability Case Studies of Manufacturing and Service Enterprise in Thailand," Managing Innovation and Diversity in Knowledge Society Through Turbulent Time: Proceedings of the MakeLearn and TIIM Joint International Conference 2016,, ToKnowPress.
    8. Irene Wei Kiong Ting & Noor Azlinna Azizan & Rajesh Kumar Bhaskaran & Sujit K Sukumaran, 2019. "Corporate Social Performance and Firm Performance: Comparative Study among Developed and Emerging Market Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Souhir Khemir, 2011. "Identification des attentes et des besoins des professionnels financiers tunisiens en matière de critères ESG," Post-Print hal-00650534, HAL.
    10. Chaokai Xue & Xinghua Dang & Beibei Shi & Jing Gu, 2019. "Information Sharing and Investment Performance in the Venture Capital Network Community: An Empirical Study of Environmental-Social-Governance Start-Ups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Burger, Eric & Grba, Fabian & Heidorn, Thomas, 2022. "The impact of ESG ratings on implied and historical volatility," Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series 230, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management.
    12. Diana-Maria Tînjalã & Alexandru Buglea, 2015. "Key Sustainability Metrics For Labour Practices – A Comparative Evolution Of Freedom Of Association And Of Non-Discrimination In Emerging/Frontier And Developed Markets," GUT FME Conference Publications, in: Katarzyna Stankiewicz (ed.),Contemporary Issues and Challenges in Human Resource Management, chapter 2, pages 18-31, Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdansk University of Technology.
    13. Hassan, M. Kabir & Chiaramonte, Laura & Dreassi, Alberto & Paltrinieri, Andrea & Piserà, Stefano, 2022. "The religious fringe of Corporate Social Responsibility," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 243-265.
    14. Ge Ge & Xiang Xiao & Zhenzhu Li & Qinghui Dai, 2022. "Does ESG Performance Promote High-Quality Development of Enterprises in China? The Mediating Role of Innovation Input," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.
    15. Bohyun Yoon & Jeong Hwan Lee & Ryan Byun, 2018. "Does ESG Performance Enhance Firm Value? Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    16. Semenova, Natalia, 2010. "Corporate Environmental Performance: Consistency of Metrics and Identification of Drivers," Sustainable Investment and Corporate Governance Working Papers 2010/9, Sustainable Investment Research Platform.
    17. Andrea Cardoni & Evgeniia Kiseleva & Simona Arduini & Simone Terzani, 2024. "From sustainable value to shareholder value: The impact of sustainable governance and anti‐corruption programs on market valuation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 19-42, January.
    18. Les Coleman, 2011. "Losses from Failure of Stakeholder Sensitive Processes: Financial Consequences for Large US Companies from Breakdowns in Product, Environmental, and Accounting Standards," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(2), pages 247-258, January.
    19. Gabriel, Vítor, 2018. "Environmentally sustainable investment: Dynamics between global thematic indices," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    20. Kabir Hassan, M. & Chiaramonte, Laura & Dreassi, Alberto & Paltrinieri, Andrea & Piserà, Stefano, 2021. "The crossroads of ESG and religious screening on firm risk," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2012060040121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mendelu.cz/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.