IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/je8794/doi10.1429-80929y2015i2p125-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Budgeting: Insights from Current Methodologies and Experiences in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Tindara Addabbo
  • Gulay Gunluk-Senesen
  • Angela O'Hagan

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Tindara Addabbo & Gulay Gunluk-Senesen & Angela O'Hagan, 2015. "Gender Budgeting: Insights from Current Methodologies and Experiences in Europe," Politica economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 125-134.
    • Handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/80929:y:2015:i:2:p:125-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1429/80929
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1429/80929
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carla Del Gesso, 2019. "Gender Budgeting Implementation in Italian Regional Governments: Institutional Behavior for Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 110-110, November.
    2. Jim Campbell & Morag Gillespie, 2017. "Gender analysis of spending on the Scottish Modern Apprenticeship programme," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(5), pages 420-432, August.
    3. Chiara Oppi & Caterina Cavicchi & Emidia Vagnoni, 2021. "The Journey to Gender-Responsive Budgeting: Lessons Learned from Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Finnborg S. Steinþórsdóttir & Thomas Brorsen Smidt & Gyða M. Pétursdóttir & Þorgerður Einarsdóttir & Nicky Le Feuvre, 2019. "New managerialism in the academy: Gender bias and precarity," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 124-139, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/80929:y:2015:i:2:p:125-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.