IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jb33yl/doi10.1428-9449y2003i2p201-224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Croce e la scienza economica

Author

Listed:
  • Aldo Montesano

Abstract

Economics has an important role in Croce's system, belonging, together with ethics, to the philosophy of the practical. Moreover, Croce disputed with Pareto on the foundations of economics. This dispute and final Croce's systematization are presented and discussed in the paper in some detail. Croce separated sharply the Science of economics from the Philosophy of economics and asserted that the former, as well as every naturalistic science, does not lead to the true knowledge, but it is only mathematics applied to the concept of volition with a practical scope.

Suggested Citation

  • Aldo Montesano, 2003. "Croce e la scienza economica," Economia politica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 201-224.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jb33yl:doi:10.1428/9449:y:2003:i:2:p:201-224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1428/9449
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1428/9449
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Silvestri, Paolo, 2015. "Disputed (Disciplinary) Boundaries. Philosophy, Economics, Value Judgments," CESMEP Working Papers 201504, University of Turin.
    2. Silvestri, Paolo, 2010. "Liberalismo, legge, normatività. Per una rilettura epistemologica del dibattito Croce-Einaudi [Liberalism, law, normativity. For an epistemological re-reading of the Croce-Einaudi debate]," MPRA Paper 60051, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2009.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jb33yl:doi:10.1428/9449:y:2003:i:2:p:201-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.