IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mje/mjejnl/v16y2020i4187-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining the Strategic Prospects of an Enterprise by Assessing the Dynamics of its Intellectual Rent

Author

Listed:
  • Nikolay Dmitriev
  • Andrey Zaytsev
  • Lyudmila Dubanevich

Abstract

The success of long-term economic development of enterprises depends on the resources they use in their business operations. Until recently, efficiency was achieved mainly through material resources. However, economic transformation has increased the importance of non-material components in the performance of any enterprise. The intellectualization of production makes it possible to talk about the availability of intellectual rent, which is a prerequisite for successful business operations. This study aims to explore the possibility of assessing dynamics of the intellectual rent of enterprises based on proprietary tools to determine the strategic prospects of business entities. The study uses mathematical calculation of excessive profits gained by the enterprise from its operation. The authors make an assumption that it is strategically important for any modern enterprise to efficiently use intellectual capital in its activities. By calculating the volume of intellectual rent and comparing the obtained data between different entities, it is possible to determine the prospects for further economic development and formulate recommendations for improving business operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikolay Dmitriev & Andrey Zaytsev & Lyudmila Dubanevich, 2020. "Determining the Strategic Prospects of an Enterprise by Assessing the Dynamics of its Intellectual Rent," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 16(4), pages 187-197.
    • Handle: RePEc:mje:mjejnl:v:16:y:2020:i:4:187-197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.mnje.com/mje/2020/v16-n04/mje_2020_v16-n04-a25.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cédric Durand & Wiliiam Milberg, 2020. "Intellectual monopoly in global value chains," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 404-429, March.
    2. Sridhar P. Nerur & Abdul A. Rasheed & Vivek Natarajan, 2008. "The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: an author co‐citation analysis," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 319-336, March.
    3. Jona-Lasinio, Cecilia & Manzocchi, Stefano & Meliciani, Valentina, 2019. "Knowledge based capital and value creation in global supply chains," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    4. Carla Marchese & Fabio Privileggi, 2018. "Endogenous economic growth with disembodied knowledge," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 20(3), pages 437-449, June.
    5. Pavel Pavlovich Vetrenko & Elena Alexandrovna Chernysheva & Irina Yrievna Levitina & Olga Vasilevna Voronkova & Dariya Georgievna Mikheeva, 2017. "Encouraging Employees to Increase the Labor Intellectualization Level as a Factor of Evolution of the Intellectual Capital," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 568-577.
    6. Schwab, Daniel & Werker, Eric, 2018. "Are economic rents good for development? Evidence from the manufacturing sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 33-45.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Jaax & Sébastien Miroudot, 2021. "Capturing value in GVCs through intangible assets: The role of the trade–investment–intellectual property nexus," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(3), pages 433-452, September.
    2. Tsakanikas, Aggelos & Roth, Felix & Caliò, Simone & Caloghirou, Yannis & Dimas, Petros, 2020. "The contribution of intangible inputs and participation in global value chains to productivity performance – Evidence from the EU-28, 2000-2014," Hamburg Discussion Papers in International Economics 5, University of Hamburg, Department of Economics.
    3. Marek Pekarčík & Júlia Ďurčová & Jozef Glova, 2022. "Intangible ICT and Their Importance within Global Value Chains: An Empirical Analysis Based on Longitudinal Data Regression," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, April.
    4. David Jordan & John Turner, 2021. "Northern Ireland's Productivity Challenge: Exploring the issues," Insight Papers 004, The Productivity Institute.
    5. Filippo Corsini & Rafael Laurenti & Franziska Meinherz & Francesco Paolo Appio & Luca Mora, 2019. "The Advent of Practice Theories in Research on Sustainable Consumption: Past, Current and Future Directions of the Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Toma Lankauskiene, 2021. "Labour Productivity Growth Determinants in the Manufacturing Sector in the Baltic States," ConScienS Conference Proceedings 025tl, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    7. Florian Léon, 2022. "The elusive quest for high-growth firms in Africa: when other metrics of performance say nothing," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 225-246, January.
    8. Rogerio S. Victer, 2020. "Connectivity knowledge and the degree of structural formalization: a contribution to a contingency theory of organizational capability," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Souzanchi Kashani, Ebrahim & Roshani, Saeed, 2019. "Evolution of innovation system literature: Intellectual bases and emerging trends," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 68-80.
    10. Joel Rabinovich & Niall Reddy, 2024. "Corporate Financialization: A Conceptual Clarification and Critical Review of the Literature," Working Papers PKWP2402, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    11. Dixit, Aasheesh & Jakhar, Suresh Kumar, 2021. "Airport capacity management: A review and bibliometric analysis," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Enrico Sergio Levrero & Giacomo Sbrenna, 2022. "Some Factors Affecting US Capital Profitability over the Last Decades," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 16(2), pages 77-101, December.
    13. Simon Hartmann & Thomas Lindner & Jakob Müllner & Jonas Puck, 2022. "Beyond the nation-state: Anchoring supranational institutions in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 1282-1306, August.
    14. Julienne Brabet & Corinne Vercher- Chaptal & Lucy Taska, 2020. "From oligopolistic digital platforms to Open/Cooperative Ones?," Post-Print hal-03201454, HAL.
    15. Nadia Preghenella & Cinzia Battistella, 2021. "Exploring business models for sustainability: A bibliographic investigation of the literature and future research directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2505-2522, July.
    16. Paulo Rita & Ricardo F. Ramos, 2022. "Global Research Trends in Consumer Behavior and Sustainability in E-Commerce: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Knowledge Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Simon Zaby, 2019. "Science Mapping of the Global Knowledge Base on Microfinance: Influential Authors and Documents, 1989–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-21, July.
    18. Suma Athreye & Lucia Piscitello & Kenneth C. Shadlen, 2020. "Twenty-five years since TRIPS: Patent policy and international business," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(4), pages 315-328, December.
    19. Mehmet Ali Köseoglu & John A. Parnell & Melissa Yan Yee Yick, 2021. "Identifying influential studies and maturity level in intellectual structure of fields: evidence from strategic management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1271-1309, February.
    20. Ugo Pagano, 2019. "Proprietà e controllo delle grandi imprese: un’interpretazione del resistibile declino italiano," Department of Economics University of Siena 798, Department of Economics, University of Siena.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mje:mjejnl:v:16:y:2020:i:4:187-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nikola Draskovic Jelcic (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.mnje.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.