IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mhr/jinste/urnsici0932-4569(200403)1601_126rdrftp_2.0.tx_2-i.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reexamining Drug Regulation from the Perspective of Innovation Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca S. Eisenberg

Abstract

The patent system typically takes credit for motivating biopharmaceutical innovation by making it profitable, while drug regulation gets blamed for burdening innovation with bureaucratic costs and delays. But FDA regulation in fact promotes profitability by prolonging exclusivity in product markets and by protecting against parallel imports. Firms may prefer FDA-administered exclusivities to expanded patent protection because they protect product markets without also adding to R&D costs. FDA-administered exclusivities may also face fewer legal and political obstacles than expanded patent protection, although as pressure mounts to constrain the rising costs of drugs, the political environment is changing.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca S. Eisenberg, 2004. "Reexamining Drug Regulation from the Perspective of Innovation Policy," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 160(1), pages 126-135, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:mhr:jinste:urn:sici:0932-4569(200403)160:1_126:rdrftp_2.0.tx_2-i
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/article/reexamining-drug-regulation-from-the-perspective-of-innovation-policy-101628093245604773861168
    Download Restriction: Fulltext access is included for subscribers to the printed version.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roland Kirstein & Birgit Will, 2006. "Efficient compensation for employees' inventions," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 129-148, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • K29 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Other
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mhr:jinste:urn:sici:0932-4569(200403)160:1_126:rdrftp_2.0.tx_2-i. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Wolpert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/jite .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.