IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mbr/jmonec/v15y2020i2p135-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Satisficing Game Theory for Performance Evaluation of Banks’ Branches (Case Study in the Mellat Bank)

Author

Listed:
  • Kahfi, Atefeh

    (Bank Mellat)

  • Sadeghian, Ramin

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Payame Noor University)

  • Darabi, Nasim

    (Bank Mellat)

Abstract

Due to its role in the identification of inefficient branches and deciding the consistency of their activities, evaluating the performance of a bank's branches is one of the most important decisions in the field of development and regulation of branch network. In this paper, the satisfactory functions based on game theory strategies have been utilized in order to evaluate the individual and within-group performance of the bank's branches. The proposed approach is based on a cooperative game theory, and the number of players is equal to the number of units which must be evaluated. The satisficing equilibrium set includes the options which are qualified as “good enough” or the efficient units which are both individually and within-group efficient. By applying our analytical method to the bank Mellat case study, we have presented solutions to improve the efficiency of inefficient branches and the branches which are only individually or within-group efficient using sensitivity analysis techniques. Lastly, if efficiency improvement is not possible, we have suggested omitting the branch.

Suggested Citation

  • Kahfi, Atefeh & Sadeghian, Ramin & Darabi, Nasim, 2020. "Using Satisficing Game Theory for Performance Evaluation of Banks’ Branches (Case Study in the Mellat Bank)," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 15(2), pages 135-150, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:mbr:jmonec:v:15:y:2020:i:2:p:135-150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jme.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-462-en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://jme.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-462-en.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paradi, Joseph C. & Zhu, Haiyan, 2013. "A survey on bank branch efficiency and performance research with data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 61-79.
    2. Lozano, S., 2012. "Information sharing in DEA: A cooperative game theory approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 558-565.
    3. Hao, Gang & Wei, Quanling & Yan, Hong, 2000. "The generalized DEA model and the convex cone constrained game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 515-525, November.
    4. Hashem Omrani & Khatereh Shafaat & Arash Alizadeh, 2019. "Integrated data envelopment analysis and cooperative game for evaluating energy efficiency of transportation sector: a case of Iran," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 471-499, March.
    5. Cook, Wade D. & Seiford, Larry M., 2009. "Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Dimitris Despotis & Gregory Koronakos & Dimitris Sotiros, 2016. "Composition versus decomposition in two-stage network DEA: a reverse approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 71-87, February.
    7. Fadzlan Sufian & Fakarudin Kamarudin, 2017. "Forced Mergers on Bank Efficiency and Productivity: Evidence from Semi-parametric Malmquist Productivity Index," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(1), pages 19-44, February.
    8. Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Matousek, Roman, 2017. "Modelling bank performance: A network DEA approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 721-732.
    9. Fethi, Meryem Duygun & Pasiouras, Fotios, 2010. "Assessing bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(2), pages 189-198, July.
    10. William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Kaoru Tone, 2007. "Data Envelopment Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-45283-8, November.
    11. Lozano, S., 2013. "DEA production games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 405-413.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manh D. Pham & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2018. "Slack-based directional distance function in the presence of bad outputs: theory and application to Vietnamese banking," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 153-187, February.
    2. Jamal Ouenniche & Skarleth Carrales, 2018. "Assessing efficiency profiles of UK commercial banks: a DEA analysis with regression-based feedback," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 266(1), pages 551-587, July.
    3. Svetlana V. Ratner & Artem M. Shaposhnikov & Andrey V. Lychev, 2023. "Network DEA and Its Applications (2017–2022): A Systematic Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Zhang, Linyan & Chen, Kun, 2019. "Hierarchical network systems: An application to high-technology industry in China," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 118-131.
    5. Wu, Jie & Xu, Guangcheng & Zhu, Qingyuan & Zhang, Chaochao, 2021. "Two-stage DEA models with fairness concern: Modelling and computational aspects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    6. Nisar Ahmad & Amjad Naveed & Shabbir Ahmad & Irfan Butt, 2020. "Banking Sector Performance, Profitability, And Efficiency: A Citation‐Based Systematic Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 185-218, February.
    7. Dan Li & Yanfeng Li & Yeming Gong & Jiawei Yang, 2021. "Estimation of bank performance from multiple perspectives: an alternative solution to the deposit dilemma," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 151-170, December.
    8. Mohamed Dia & Amirmohsen Golmohammadi & Pawoumodom M. Takouda, 2020. "Relative Efficiency of Canadian Banks: A Three-Stage Network Bootstrap DEA," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Utsav Pandey & Sanjeet Singh, 2022. "Data envelopment analysis in hierarchical category structure with fuzzy boundaries," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1517-1549, August.
    10. Wade D. Cook & Chuanyin Guo & Wanghong Li & Zhepeng Li & Liang Liang & Joe Zhu, 2017. "Efficiency Measurement of Multistage Processes: Context Dependent Numbers of Stages," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(06), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Xiaohong Liu & Jiasen Sun & Feng Yang & Jie Wu, 2020. "How ownership structure affects bank deposits and loan efficiencies: an empirical analysis of Chinese commercial banks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 983-1008, July.
    12. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2015. "Efficiency of the banking system in Vietnam under financial liberalization," OSF Preprints qsf6d, Center for Open Science.
    13. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Lu, Wen-Min, 2016. "Research fronts in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 33-45.
    14. Sepideh Kaffash & Marianna Marra, 2017. "Data envelopment analysis in financial services: a citations network analysis of banks, insurance companies and money market funds," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 307-344, June.
    15. Aggelopoulos, Eleftherios & Georgopoulos, Antonios, 2017. "Bank branch efficiency under environmental change: A bootstrap DEA on monthly profit and loss accounting statements of Greek retail branches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 1170-1188.
    16. Johann Burgstaller, 2020. "Retail‐bank efficiency: Nonstandard goals and environmental determinants," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(2), pages 269-301, June.
    17. Lina Novickytė & Jolanta Droždz, 2018. "Measuring the Efficiency in the Lithuanian Banking Sector: The DEA Application," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Li, Yongjun & Xie, Jianhui & Wang, Meiqiang & Liang, Liang, 2016. "Super efficiency evaluation using a common platform on a cooperative game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 884-892.
    19. Alperovych, Yan & Hübner, Georges & Lobet, Fabrice, 2015. "How does governmental versus private venture capital backing affect a firm's efficiency? Evidence from Belgium," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 508-525.
    20. Vaneet Bhatia & Sankarshan Basu & Subrata Kumar Mitra & Pradyumna Dash, 2018. "A review of bank efficiency and productivity," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 55(3), pages 557-600, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Performance Evaluation; Individual and Within-Group Evaluation; Satisficing Game Theory; Cooperative Game Theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C71 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Cooperative Games
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mbr:jmonec:v:15:y:2020:i:2:p:135-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: M. E. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mbcbiir.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.