IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mbr/jmonec/v10y2015i3p87-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Product Development Risk Assessment in the Core Banking Using FMEA Combined with COPRAS Method and Grey Relations

Author

Listed:
  • Alinezhad , Alireza

    (Faculty of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University)

  • Amini , Amir

    (Industrial Engineering, Alghadir Institute of Higher Education)

  • Rahmani , Mahsa

    (Faculty of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University)

Abstract

The present study tries to investigate the existing risks in the new product development process in the core banking field. Due to its use after production, new product development with the fewest errors and risks is always the subject of discussion and investigation among the researchers of this field. This study aims to investigate the most important risks existing in the new product development. The most important issue in this regard is that the market of manufactured products is increasingly competitive and the life-cycle of products is in decline due to environmental impacts. These factors force companies to follow such a process (new product development). Many techniques have been invented and applied in order to assess and manage the existing risks in different processes. Failure modes analysis technique and its resulted effects (FMEA) are considered as one of the most effective techniques that have been used for risk assessment of new product development in this study. Also, CORPAS-G method is used for prioritizing the detected risks. The purpose of this study is to identify the risks of new product and their priority for corrective measures to reduce the probable risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Alinezhad , Alireza & Amini , Amir & Rahmani , Mahsa, 2015. "New Product Development Risk Assessment in the Core Banking Using FMEA Combined with COPRAS Method and Grey Relations," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 10(3), pages 87-121, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:mbr:jmonec:v:10:y:2015:i:3:p:87-121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jme.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-155-en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://jme.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-155-en.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romualdas Ginevičius & Valentinas Podvezko, 2008. "Multicriteria evaluation of Lithuanian banks from the perspective of their reliability for clients," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 257-267, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jelena Stankevičienė & Ieva Petronienė, 2019. "Bond Mutual Funds vs. Bond Exchange Traded Funds: Evaluation of Risk Adjusted Performance," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Willem Karel M. Brauers & Romualdas Ginevičius & Askoldas Podviezko, 2014. "Development of a Methodology of Evaluation of Financial Stability of Commercial Banks," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 61(3), pages 349-367, June.
    3. Zaneta Karazijiene & Arturas Jurgelevichius, 2016. "Expanded Concept of Human Capital as Intangible Resource at Macro Level," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 12(4), pages 141-156.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Risk assessment; Risk management; New product development; Core banking; FMEA; COPRAS-G;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • D40 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - General
    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • D92 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Intertemporal Firm Choice, Investment, Capacity, and Financing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mbr:jmonec:v:10:y:2015:i:3:p:87-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: M. E. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mbcbiir.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.