IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev1rl/v10y2023i2p24-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CJEU Decision C- 107/23 PPU: Protection of the EU Financial Interests and the National Principle of †Lex Mitiorâ€

Author

Listed:
  • Răzvan VIORESCU

    (Associate professor, Phd., "Stefan cel Mare" University, Suceava, Romania)

Abstract

The CJEU decision C-107/23 PPU of July 24, 2023 creates two large categories of legal problems: a first category from the perspective of Union law and a second category from the perspective of domestic law. The European perspective is of less interest for the present analysis, but at least two elements that are closely related and which we will develop on another occasion should be emphasized: (i) the amplification of the tendency to relax the conditions necessary to recognize the direct effect of European norms and (ii) the assumption by the CJEU of a role of judicial review. From the perspective of national law, the Lin judgment seems impossible to implement. The substance of the opposition to the national law system or a significant part of it comes, most likely, first from considerations intrinsic to the decision and only then from reasons related to the limits of the supremacy of EU law. Recently, a similar solution was adopted by the CJEU through the Ordinance of 9 January 2024 in case C-131/23, the only difference from case C-107/23 being that the interpretation of the CJEU took into account Decision 2006/928/EC of The Commission of December 13, 2006 establishing a cooperation mechanism and verifying the progress achieved by Romania in order to achieve certain specific reference objectives in the field of judicial system reform and the fight against corruption.

Suggested Citation

  • Răzvan VIORESCU, 2023. "CJEU Decision C- 107/23 PPU: Protection of the EU Financial Interests and the National Principle of †Lex Mitiorâ€," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 10(2), pages 24-33, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:24-33
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/10.2/206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/ejlpa/article/view/6801/4790
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/10.2/206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    more favourable criminal or administrative law; supremacy of the Constitution; autonomous EU standard of the principle of legality of offences and penalties; EU and national standards of protection of fundamental rights and procedural guarantees.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K19 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Other
    • K49 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:24-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.