IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/ejlpa1/v7y2020i2p80-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anticorruption Constraints as a Manifestation of the "Coherent Force" of Human Rights in the Activities of Public Administration Actors

Author

Listed:
  • Tetiana Kolomoets

    (Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Professor, Honoured Lawyer of Ukraine, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Dean of Law Faculty of Zaporizhzhya National University, Ukraine)

  • Valerii Kolpakov

    (Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Administrative and Business Law of Zaporizhzhya National University, Ukraine)

  • Igor Kovbas

    (Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Public Law Chernivtsi National University named after Y. Fedkovich)

Abstract

The search for an optimal model for relationships between individuals and entities of public administration should go hand in hand with the statutorization of the guarantees of individual rights, freedoms and legal interests, including the principle of protection of legitimate expectations of individuals in their relations with public administration entities. The research provides grounds for believing that anti-corruption restrictions for entities of public administration are the components of the above-mentioned principle since they act as a manifestation of the binding force for the latter, emphasizing anthropocentric nature of their activity. It is the standardization of models for resource utilization in regard to the activities of public administration entities with the use of anti-corruption restrictions that makes the trust of an individual to public entities possible. It also makes the actions and decisions of the latter predictable, let alone enables unification of interpretation and application of national and international legislation. Using the resource of anti-corruption restrictions, which is aimed to make it impossible for public administration entities to get distracted from their main task of protecting and realizing individuals’ legitimate expectations, a sound doctrinal analysis of the phenomena is advisable for establishing the new and consistent with the latest advances in the legal science basis for rule-making and legal enforcement in the sphere of relations between individuals and entities of public administration. Owing to the statutorization of the use of relevant anti-corruption restrictions as well as compliance with technicalities and proper response to modern challenges, the conclusion is made about a great potential for quality assurance of the anti-corruption law with its availability, intelligibility for all legal entities in the sphere of public administration, unification of its use and interpretation and hence the predictability of the decisions and actions of public administration entities, guarantee of realization and protection of the legitimate expectations of individuals in their relations with the latter.

Suggested Citation

  • Tetiana Kolomoets & Valerii Kolpakov & Igor Kovbas, 2020. "Anticorruption Constraints as a Manifestation of the "Coherent Force" of Human Rights in the Activities of Public Administration Actors," European Journal of Law and Public Administration, Editura LUMEN, vol. 7(2), pages 80-91, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:ejlpa1:v:7:y:2020:i:2:p:80-91
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/7.2/129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/ejlpa/article/view/4072
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/7.2/129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    activities of public; anticorruption constraints; coherent force; corruption; freedoms and legal interests; human rights; legal energy; protection of the legitimate expectations; public administration; subject of public;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)
    • K15 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Civil Law; Common Law
    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:ejlpa1:v:7:y:2020:i:2:p:80-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.