IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/ejlpa1/v6y2019i2p223-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Jurisdictional Means of Resolving International Conflicts

Author

Listed:
  • Dumitrita Florea

    (Lecturer Phd, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania)

  • Narcisa Gales

    (Lecturer Phd, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania)

  • Loredana Terec-Vlad

    (Drd., Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania)

Abstract

Starting from the quasi-general expression of International Rule of Law, we note that the emergence and diversification of international jurisdictions contributes to increasing the role of international law in the contemporary international community, as well as to maintaining the international legal order. We agree with the doctrines that international justice made up of the jurisdictional and arbitral courts is an important way of applying the norms of international law, of influencing the development of international law and of strengthening the international public order. According to art. 33 paragraph 1 of the UN Charter, the judicial means of dispute resolution represent arbitration and the judicial path, together with negotiations, mediation, conciliation, investigation or recourse to regional organizations or agreements. Analyzed from the terminological perspective, the expression "international jurisdiction" means a set of arbitration or judicial bodies established by the agreement between states or other subjects of international law, in order to resolve any international differences. The role of international courts is, among others: to resolve international disputes, to interpret international law, to apply existing international law, to identify existing international law and new customary norms, to influence the process of creating international law, to carry out the function of international law for the ordering of international relations. The process of establishing the common will of the states, expressed in the principles and norms of international law, is an arduous, difficult one, in which the most contradictory interests of the participating states are often confronted. The fundamental principles of contemporary international law that must govern the relations between all the states are called to constitute the substance of international relations, an essential component of an international, political and economic order. Their strict respecting is the sine qua non condition of world peace and security, the democratization of international relations. Against this background and in the current international context, when the political-military events have multiplied with unpredictable and dangerous effects for the world security, a special importance in their peaceful resolution as a legal institution of international law, is negotiated as the main means of settlement of international disputes.

Suggested Citation

  • Dumitrita Florea & Narcisa Gales & Loredana Terec-Vlad, 2019. "Jurisdictional Means of Resolving International Conflicts," European Journal of Law and Public Administration, Editura LUMEN, vol. 6(2), pages 223-235, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:ejlpa1:v:6:y:2019:i:2:p:223-235
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/ejlpa/article/view/2345
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/99?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International jurisdiction; law; conflicts.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H7 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations
    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)
    • K15 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Civil Law; Common Law
    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:ejlpa1:v:6:y:2019:i:2:p:223-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.