IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/2051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Szabályozási tesztkörnyezet az energetikában: innováció és szabályozás
[Regulatory sandboxes in the energy sector: innovation and regulation]

Author

Listed:
  • Pék, Zoltán

Abstract

A tanulmány a szabályozási tesztkörnyezet (regulatory sandbox) intézményét vizsgálja, áttekinti kialakulásának okait, összegyűjti a szakirodalomban a különböző szektorokban működő szabályozási tesztkörnyezetek előnyeit és hátrányait, valamint kitér annak korlátaira. Ezt követően a külföldi legjobb gyakorlatok alapján meghatározza a szabályozási tesztkörnyezet sarokköveit, és csoportosítja az elérhető "szolgáltatásokat". Az általános elemzés után az energetikai szektorban működő szabályozási tesztkörnyezetek legjobb gyakorlatainak bemutatására kerül sor, ennek keretében az Egyesült Királyságban és Németországban működő modelleket részletesen is tárgyalja, valamint áttekinti még azokat a további szabályozási tesztkörnyezeteket, amelyek értékes tapasztalattal szolgálhatnak egy esetleges hazai implementáció során. A tanulmány utolsó része a hazai szabályozási tesztkörnyezet lehetőségeit boncolgatva röviden javaslatot tesz egy "magyar modell" kialakítására az energetikában. Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: K32.

Suggested Citation

  • Pék, Zoltán, 2022. "Szabályozási tesztkörnyezet az energetikában: innováció és szabályozás [Regulatory sandboxes in the energy sector: innovation and regulation]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 625-642.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:2051
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2022.5.625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=2051
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2022.5.625?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esther C. van der Waal & Alexandra M. Das & Tineke van der Schoor, 2020. "Participatory Experimentation with Energy Law: Digging in a ‘Regulatory Sandbox’ for Local Energy Initiatives in the Netherlands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Lo Schiavo, Luca & Delfanti, Maurizio & Fumagalli, Elena & Olivieri, Valeria, 2013. "Changing the regulation for regulating the change: Innovation-driven regulatory developments for smart grids, smart metering and e-mobility in Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 506-517.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bovera, Filippo & Lo Schiavo, Luca, 2022. "From energy communities to sector coupling:a taxonomy for regulatory experimentation in the age of the European Green Deal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    2. Veseli, Argjenta & Moser, Simon & Kubeczko, Klaus & Madner, Verena & Wang, Anna & Wolfsgruber, Klaus, 2021. "Practical necessity and legal options for introducing energy regulatory sandboxes in Austria," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    3. Schittekatte, Tim & Meeus, Leonardo & Jamasb, Tooraj & Llorca, Manuel, 2021. "Regulatory experimentation in energy: Three pioneer countries and lessons for the green transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    4. Beckstedde, Ellen & Correa Ramírez, Mauricio & Cossent, Rafael & Vanschoenwinkel, Janka & Meeus, Leonardo, 2023. "Regulatory sandboxes: Do they speed up innovation in energy?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    5. Christian Wankmüller & Maximilian Kunovjanek & Robert Gennaro Sposato & Gerald Reiner, 2020. "Selecting E-Mobility Transport Solutions for Mountain Rescue Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Covatariu, A. & Duma, D. & Giulietti, M. & Pollitt M., 2023. "Toward an operational definition and a. methodology for measurement of the active DSO (distribution system operator) for electricity and gas," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2348, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    7. Anuta, Oghenetejiri Harold & Taylor, Phil & Jones, Darren & McEntee, Tony & Wade, Neal, 2014. "An international review of the implications of regulatory and electricity market structures on the emergence of grid scale electricity storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 489-508.
    8. T. Jamasb & R. Nepal, 2015. "Issues and Options in the Economic Regulation of European Network Security," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 16(1), pages 2-23, March.
    9. Meletiou, Alexis & Cambini, Carlo & Masera, Marcelo, 2018. "Regulatory and ownership determinants of unbundling regime choice for European electricity transmission utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 13-25.
    10. Aurelie Tricoire, 2015. "Uncertainty, vision, and the vitality of the emerging smart grid," Post-Print hal-02351994, HAL.
    11. Savvidis, Georgios & Siala, Kais & Weissbart, Christoph & Schmidt, Lukas & Borggrefe, Frieder & Kumar, Subhash & Pittel, Karen & Madlener, Reinhard & Hufendiek, Kai, 2019. "The gap between energy policy challenges and model capabilities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 503-520.
    12. Bovera, Filippo & Delfanti, Maurizio & Fumagalli, Elena & Lo Schiavo, Luca & Vailati, Riccardo, 2021. "Regulating electricity distribution networks under technological and demand uncertainty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Becker, Sophia & Schober, Dominik & Wassermann, Sandra, 2016. "How to approach consumers’ nonmonetary evaluation of electricity supply security? The case of Germany from a multidisciplinary perspective," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 74-84.
    14. Shaukat, N. & Khan, B. & Ali, S.M. & Mehmood, C.A. & Khan, J. & Farid, U. & Majid, M. & Anwar, S.M. & Jawad, M. & Ullah, Z., 2018. "A survey on electric vehicle transportation within smart grid system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1329-1349.
    15. He, Xian & Keyaerts, Nico & Azevedo, Isabel & Meeus, Leonardo & Hancher, Leigh & Glachant, Jean-Michel, 2013. "How to engage consumers in demand response: A contract perspective," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 108-122.
    16. Lee, Sungdo & Seo, Yongseok, 2022. "Exploring how interest groups affect regulation and innovation based on the two-level games: The case of regulatory sandboxes in Korea," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    17. Niesten, Eva & Alkemade, Floortje, 2016. "How is value created and captured in smart grids? A review of the literature and an analysis of pilot projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 629-638.
    18. Ball, Christopher Stephen & Vögele, Stefan & Grajewski, Matthias & Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm, 2021. "E-mobility from a multi-actor point of view: Uncertainties and their impacts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    19. Marina Bertolini & Marco Buso & Luciano Greco, 2018. "Competition and Regulation with Smart Grids," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0226, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    20. Sapio, Alessandro & Spagnolo, Nicola, 2020. "The effect of a new power cable on energy prices volatility spillovers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:2051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.