IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/khe/journl/v5y2013i3p85-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effective Mediation Compared with the Traditional Legal

Author

Listed:
  • Mihai Dorel Vlad

    ("Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University)

Abstract

Mediation does not always guarantee success, in turn, may facilitate communication between the parties and can be a beginning for dialogue that will follow. The role of mediation is to create positive effects in a conflict approach, to improve understanding between the parties and to support creative thinking. For these reasons you should at least consider, if not applied, as an alternative solution to conflicts that seem to no longer settle. The role of mediation is precisely to overcome communication barriers conflict and saving relationship between the two parties. We live in an era of globalization, the need to survive and impose your cause major changes in all fields and in the attitudes and actions, becoming the main element to the success of any level or any field.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihai Dorel Vlad, 2013. "Effective Mediation Compared with the Traditional Legal," Knowledge Horizons - Economics, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 5(3), pages 85-89, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:85-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/2013_khe_3_pdf/khe_vol_5_iss_3_85to89.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/2013_khe_3_pdf/khe_vol_5_iss_3_85to89.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Mediation; communication; conflict; justice;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J52 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Dispute Resolution: Strikes, Arbitration, and Mediation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:85-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adi Sava (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffucdro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.