IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v105y2000i3-4p373-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Politics and Geography Related? Evidence from a Cross-Section of Capital Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Dascher, Kristof

Abstract

With a few prominent exceptions, a capital city is typically also the biggest city of its country. This might suggest that a capital city is more attractive than other cities because of the capital city function. In the paper, we test this hypothesis by looking at employment growth in a sample of capital cities. Employment growth might indicate outmigration from the political hinterland and immigration into the capital city. Specifically, we look at a sample of regional capitals that consists of West-German county seats. These county seats underwent reform in the late sixties and early seventies. In this sample, we can reject the idea that the county capital role does not have a positive influence on local employment growth. Copyright 2000 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Dascher, Kristof, 2000. "Are Politics and Geography Related? Evidence from a Cross-Section of Capital Cities," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 105(3-4), pages 373-392, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:105:y:2000:i:3-4:p:373-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0048-5829/contents
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Łukomska Julita, 2018. "Factors explaining the changes in the rankings of Polish cities’ economic position (1992-2013)," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 48-55, March.
    2. Katarzyna Przybyła & Marian Kachniarz & Maria Hełdak, 2018. "The Impact of Administrative Reform on Labour Market Transformations in Large Polish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Zaborowski Tomasz, 2020. "Factors of Divergence between Peripheral and Central Subregions: The Case of Mazovia Province, Poland," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(4), pages 39-51, December.
    4. Kristian Behrens & Alain Pholo Bala, 2013. "Do rent-seeking and interregional transfers contribute to urban primacy in Sub-Saharan Africa?," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(1), pages 163-195, March.
    5. A. I. Treivish, 2016. "Capital cities and state borders: Spatial relationships and shifts," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 244-257, July.
    6. Bastian Heider & Martin T. W. Rosenfeld & Albrecht Kauffmann, 2018. "Does Administrative Status Matter for Urban Growth? Evidence from Present and Former County Capitals in East Germany," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 33-54, March.
    7. Sidney C. Turner, 2014. "Public Sector Agglomeration in Developed Countries: The Role of Oversight," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 191-210, June.
    8. Przybyla, Katarzyna & Kachniarz, Marian & Ramsey, David, 2020. "The investment activity of cities in the context of their administrative status: A case study from Poland," MPRA Paper 100230, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Borys Cie?lak & Paula Nagler & Frank van Oort, 2023. "Regional Capital No More. How the Reform of the Territorial Government has Marginalized Polish Middle-sized Cities," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 23-001/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    10. Robert Harmel & Chen Shen & Yao‐Yuan Yeh, 2022. "Understanding Chinese nationalism: Does location matter?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(3), pages 670-685, May.
    11. Doris Kokutungisa Ishenda & Shi Guoqing, 2019. "Determinants in Relocation of Capital Cities," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(4), pages 200-220, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:105:y:2000:i:3-4:p:373-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.