This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Similarity and Preferences in the Space of Simple Lotteries

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Aizpurua, J M, et al
Abstract

A. Rubinstein's similarity-relation approach to decision-making under uncertainty is extended.by introducing a new concept of correlated similarity relations. It is shown that every expected utility preference is consistent with the [epsilon]-difference similarity relation on the prize space and some correlated similarity relations on the probability space, and that a similarity relation on the prize space and correlated similarity relations on the probability space overdetermine the preference (in A. Rubinstein's sense). Coauthors are T. Ichiishi, J. Nieto, and J. R. Uriarte. Copyright 1993 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Springer in its journal Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.

Volume (Year): 6 (1993)
Issue (Month): 3 (June)
Pages: 289-97
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:6:y:1993:i:3:p:289-97

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.springerlink.com/link.asp?id=100299

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Jonathan W. Leland, 2006. "Equilibrium Selection, Similarity Judgments and the“Nothing to Gain/Nothing to Lose”Effect," Levine's Working Paper Archive 321307000000000378, David K. Levine. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  2. Antonio Cabrales & Jose Ramon Uriarte, 2008. "Doubts and equilibria," Economics Working Papers we080905, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economía. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
    • Antonio Cabrales & José Ramón Uriarte Ayo, 2008. "Doubts and Equilibria," IKERLANAK 200831, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico I. [Downloadable!]
  3. Konstantinos Katsikopoulos & Gerd Gigerenzer, 2008. "One-reason decision-making: Modeling violations of expected utility theory," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 35-56, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. David Buschena & David Zilberman, 2000. "Generalized Expected Utility, Heteroscedastic Error, and Path Dependence in Risky Choice," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 67-88, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? No RePEc service, like IDEAS, charges for the use or the display of bibliographic data.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-4.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.