IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jgeosy/v20y2018i2d10.1007_s10109-018-0265-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a framework for geospatial tangible user interfaces in collaborative urban planning

Author

Listed:
  • Valérie Maquil

    (Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology)

  • Ulrich Leopold

    (Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology)

  • Luís Moreira Sousa

    (ISRIC - World Soil Information)

  • Lou Schwartz

    (Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology)

  • Eric Tobias

    (Lycée des Arts et Métiers)

Abstract

The increasing complexity of urban planning projects today requires new approaches to better integrate stakeholders with different professional backgrounds throughout a city. Traditional tools used in urban planning are designed for experts and offer little opportunity for participation and collaborative design. This paper introduces the concept of geospatial tangible user interfaces (GTUI) and reports on the design and implementation as well as the usability of such a GTUI to support stakeholder participation in collaborative urban planning. The proposed system uses physical objects to interact with large digital maps and geospatial data projected onto a tabletop. It is implemented using a PostGIS database, a web map server providing OGC web services, the computer vision framework reacTIVision, a Java-based TUIO client, and GeoTools. We describe how a GTUI has be instantiated and evaluated within the scope of two case studies related to real world collaborative urban planning scenarios. Our results confirm the feasibility of our proposed GTUI solutions to (a) instantiate different urban planning scenarios, (b) support collaboration, and (c) ensure an acceptable usability.

Suggested Citation

  • Valérie Maquil & Ulrich Leopold & Luís Moreira Sousa & Lou Schwartz & Eric Tobias, 2018. "Towards a framework for geospatial tangible user interfaces in collaborative urban planning," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 185-206, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:20:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10109-018-0265-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10109-018-0265-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10109-018-0265-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10109-018-0265-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shivanand Balram & Suzana Dragicevic & Thomas Meredith, 2003. "Achieving Effectiveness in Stakeholder Participation Using the GIS-Based Collaborative Spatial Delphi Methodology," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 365-394.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carissa Schively Slotterback, 2011. "Planners' Perspectives on Using Technology in Participatory Processes," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 38(3), pages 468-485, June.
    2. Daniel Stevens & Suzana Dragićević, 2007. "A GIS-Based Irregular Cellular Automata Model of Land-Use Change," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 34(4), pages 708-724, August.
    3. Chiara Garau, 2012. "Focus on Citizens: Public Engagement with Online and Face-to-Face Participation—A Case Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Chiara Garau, 2012. "Citizen participation in public planning: A literature review," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 1(12), pages 21-44, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Geographical information systems; Human computer interaction; Geospatial tangible user interfaces; Interactive tabletops; Collaborative urban planning; Participatory urban planning;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy
    • Q21 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Demand and Supply; Prices
    • C65 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Miscellaneous Mathematical Tools
    • C69 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Other
    • C92 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Group Behavior
    • C88 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Other Computer Software
    • Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:20:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10109-018-0265-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.