IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v4y2012i2p592-606d18351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Focus on Citizens: Public Engagement with Online and Face-to-Face Participation—A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara Garau

    (Department of Architecture, University of Cagliari, via Santa Croce, 67 Cagliari, 09124, Italy)

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to focus on how an integrated system based on Information Communication Technology (ICT) and face-to-face communication can increase participation in order to have a positive effect on quality of life, plans and decisions, and to discuss the many benefits which web-based public participation can bring to the planning process through a set of improvements to relations, quality and structure of cities in general and in this case example specifically. With the development of a transparent support system for collaborative decision-making processes, it is possible to identify a strategy for addressing gaps to reach collaborative decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Garau, 2012. "Focus on Citizens: Public Engagement with Online and Face-to-Face Participation—A Case Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:592-606:d:18351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/4/2/592/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/4/2/592/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefano De Montis & Andrea De Montis & Peter Nijkamp, 2005. "Cyber Planning e sistemi interattivi di supporto al piano: classificazione e pratiche," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2005(3).
    2. Shivanand Balram & Suzana Dragicevic & Thomas Meredith, 2003. "Achieving Effectiveness in Stakeholder Participation Using the GIS-Based Collaborative Spatial Delphi Methodology," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 365-394.
    3. Maria Manta Conroy & Steven Gordon, 2004. "Utility of interactive computer-based materials for enhancing public participation," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 19-33.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chiara Garau, 2012. "Citizen participation in public planning: A literature review," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 1(12), pages 21-44, December.
    2. Carissa Schively Slotterback, 2011. "Planners' Perspectives on Using Technology in Participatory Processes," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 38(3), pages 468-485, June.
    3. Valérie Maquil & Ulrich Leopold & Luís Moreira Sousa & Lou Schwartz & Eric Tobias, 2018. "Towards a framework for geospatial tangible user interfaces in collaborative urban planning," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 185-206, April.
    4. Chrysaida-Aliki Papadopoulou & Maria Giaoutzi, 2014. "Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Knowledge Acquisition in Spatial Planning," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Daniel Stevens & Suzana Dragićević, 2007. "A GIS-Based Irregular Cellular Automata Model of Land-Use Change," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 34(4), pages 708-724, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:592-606:d:18351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.