IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/ijhcfe/v22y2022i3d10.1007_s10754-021-09322-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Provider responses to discontinuous tariffs: evidence from Dutch rehabilitation care

Author

Listed:
  • Katalin Gaspar

    (Talma Institute/VU University Amsterdam)

  • Xander Koolman

    (Talma Institute/VU University Amsterdam)

Abstract

Abrupt jumps in reimbursement tariffs have been shown to lead to unintended effects in physicians’ behavior. A sudden change in tariffs at a pre-defined point in the treatment can incentivize health care providers to prolong treatment to reach the higher tariff, and then to discharge patients once the higher tariff is reached. The Dutch reimbursement schedule in hospital rehabilitation care follows a two-threshold stepwise-function based on treatment duration. We investigated the prevalence of strategic discharges around the first threshold and assessed whether their share varies by provider type. Our findings suggest moderate response to incentives by traditional care providers (general and academic hospitals, rehabilitation centers and multicategorical providers), and strong response by profit-oriented independent treatment centers. When examining the variation in response based on the financial position of the organization, we found a higher probability of manipulation among providers in financial distress. Our findings provide multiple insights and possible indicators to identify provider types that may be more prone to strategic behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Katalin Gaspar & Xander Koolman, 2022. "Provider responses to discontinuous tariffs: evidence from Dutch rehabilitation care," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 333-354, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:ijhcfe:v:22:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10754-021-09322-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10754-021-09322-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10754-021-09322-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10754-021-09322-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reif, Simon & Wichert, Sebastian & Wuppermann, Amelie, 2018. "Is it good to be too light? Birth weight thresholds in hospital reimbursement systems," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-25.
    2. Silverman, Elaine & Skinner, Jonathan, 2004. "Medicare upcoding and hospital ownership," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 369-389, March.
    3. Ellis, Randall P. & McGuire, Thomas G., 1986. "Provider behavior under prospective reimbursement : Cost sharing and supply," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 129-151, June.
    4. Paul J. Eliason & Paul L. E. Grieco & Ryan C. McDevitt & James W. Roberts, 2018. "Strategic Patient Discharge: The Case of Long-Term Care Hospitals," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(11), pages 3232-3265, November.
    5. Douven, Rudy & Remmerswaal, Minke & Mosca, Ilaria, 2015. "Unintended effects of reimbursement schedules in mental health care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 139-150.
    6. Liran Einav & Amy Finkelstein & Neale Mahoney, 2018. "Provider Incentives and Healthcare Costs: Evidence From Long‐Term Care Hospitals," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(6), pages 2161-2219, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clara Pott & Tom Stargardt & Udo Schneider & Simon Frey, 2021. "Do discontinuities in marginal reimbursement affect inpatient psychiatric care in Germany?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(1), pages 101-114, February.
    2. Maggie Shi, 2023. "Monitoring for Waste: Evidence from Medicare Audits," NBER Working Papers 31559, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Simon Reif & Lucas Hafner & Michael Seebauer, 2020. "Physician Behavior under Prospective Payment Schemes—Evidence from Artefactual Field and Lab Experiments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-37, July.
    4. Bäuml, Matthias & Dette, Tilman & Pollmann, Michael, 2022. "Price and income effects of hospital reimbursements," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Carine Milcent, 2021. "From downcoding to upcoding: DRG based payment in hospitals," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Bäuml, Matthias & Kümpel, Christian, 2020. "Hospital responses to the introduction of reimbursements by treatment intensity in a (presumably lump sum) DRG system," hche Research Papers 22, University of Hamburg, Hamburg Center for Health Economics (hche).
    7. Martin B. Hackmann & R. Vincent Pohl & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2018. "Patient Versus Provider Incentives in Long Term Care," NBER Working Papers 25178, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Martin Gaynor & Kate Ho & Robert J. Town, 2015. "The Industrial Organization of Health-Care Markets," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 53(2), pages 235-284, June.
    9. Dillender, Marcus & Jinks, Lu & Lo Sasso, Anthony T., 2023. "When (and why) providers do not respond to changes in reimbursement rates," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    10. Cadena, Brian C. & Smith, Austin C., 2022. "Performance pay, productivity, and strategic opt-out: Evidence from a community health center," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    11. Liran Einav & Amy Finkelstein, 2018. "Moral Hazard in Health Insurance: What We Know and How We Know It," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 957-982.
    12. Cook, Amanda & Averett, Susan, 2020. "Do hospitals respond to changing incentive structures? Evidence from Medicare’s 2007 DRG restructuring," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    13. Carine Milcent, 2019. "From downcoding to upcoding: DRG based payment in hospitals [Du downcoding au upcoding : Le paiement par DRG dans les hôpitaux]," Working Papers halshs-03966671, HAL.
    14. Matthias Bäuml, 2021. "How do hospitals respond to cross price incentives inherent in diagnosis‐related groups systems? The importance of substitution in the market for sepsis conditions," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 711-728, April.
    15. Attema, Arthur E. & Galizzi, Matteo M. & Groß, Mona & Hennig-Schmidt, Heike & Karay, Yassin & L’Haridon, Olivier & Wiesen, Daniel, 2023. "The formation of physician altruism," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    16. Rudy Douven & Minke Remmerswaal & Robin Zoutenbier, 2015. "Do Extrinsically Motivated Mental Health Care Providers Have Better Treatment Outcomes?," CPB Discussion Paper 319.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    17. Kjartan Sarheim Anthun & Johan Håkon Bjørngaard & Jon Magnussen, 2017. "Economic incentives and diagnostic coding in a public health care system," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 83-101, March.
    18. Jurgita Januleviciute & Jan Erik Askildsen & Oddvar Kaarboe & Luigi Siciliani & Matt Sutton, 2016. "How do Hospitals Respond to Price Changes? Evidence from Norway," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(5), pages 620-636, May.
    19. Carine Milcent, 2019. "From downcoding to upcoding: DRG based payment in hospitals," Working Papers halshs-02317416, HAL.
    20. Liran Einav & Amy Finkelstein & Yunan Ji & Neale Mahoney, 2020. "Randomized trial shows healthcare payment reform has equal-sized spillover effects on patients not targeted by reform," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(32), pages 18939-18947, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Provider payment; Provider incentive; Policy evaluation; Regulated competition; The Netherlands;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:ijhcfe:v:22:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10754-021-09322-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.