IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/hcarem/v23y2020i4d10.1007_s10729-020-09514-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring of high-yield and periodical processes in health care

Author

Listed:
  • Nataliya Chukhrova

    (University of Hamburg)

  • Arne Johannssen

    (University of Hamburg)

Abstract

Statistical control charts have found valuable applications in health care, having been largely adopted from operations research in manufacturing. However, the most common types are not best-suited to monitor high-yield processes (outcomes comprising true/false fractions, ‘near-zero’) and periodical processes (characterized by sequences of single populations of finite sizes), but rather to monitor variable vital signs levels and, to a lesser degree, service performance indicators. We discuss control charts that are most suitable for fraction non-conforming measurements. We focus particularly on high-yield and periodical processes, i.e. range in which out-of-control conditions are expected and should be identified. For these conditions, we discuss control charts based on the family of hypergeometric distributions, explaining and comparing their application to more traditional alternatives with two health care case studies. We demonstrate that hypergeometric-type control charts provide higher sensitivity in timely identification of changing rare event fractions and are well-suited for monitoring of periodical processes, while remaining more resistant to false alarms, versus their alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Nataliya Chukhrova & Arne Johannssen, 2020. "Monitoring of high-yield and periodical processes in health care," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 619-639, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:23:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10729-020-09514-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10729-020-09514-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10729-020-09514-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10729-020-09514-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charalambos Sismanidis & Martin Bland & Jan Poloniecki, 2003. "Properties of the Cumulative Risk-Adjusted Mortality (CRAM) Chart, Including the Number of Deaths Before a Doubling of the Death Rate is Detected," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 23(3), pages 242-251, May.
    2. O. Grigg & V. Farewell, 2004. "An overview of risk‐adjusted charts," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 167(3), pages 523-539, August.
    3. Christian Sonesson & David Bock, 2003. "A review and discussion of prospective statistical surveillance in public health," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 166(1), pages 5-21, February.
    4. Chan, L. Y. & Lai, C. D. & Xie, M. & Goh, T. N., 2003. "A two-stage decision procedure for monitoring processes with low fraction nonconforming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(2), pages 420-436, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Doyo G Enki & Paul H Garthwaite & C Paddy Farrington & Angela Noufaily & Nick J Andrews & Andre Charlett, 2016. "Comparison of Statistical Algorithms for the Detection of Infectious Disease Outbreaks in Large Multiple Surveillance Systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Hassan Assareh & Kerrie Mengersen, 2012. "Change Point Estimation in Monitoring Survival Time," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-10, March.
    3. Linus Schiöler & Marianne Fris�n, 2012. "Multivariate outbreak detection," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 223-242, April.
    4. A Bottle & P Aylin, 2011. "Predicting the false alarm rate in multi-institution mortality monitoring," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(9), pages 1711-1718, September.
    5. Bock, David & Pettersson, Kjell, 2007. "Explorative analysis of spatial aspects on the Swedish influenza data," Research Reports 2007:10, University of Gothenburg, Statistical Research Unit, School of Business, Economics and Law.
    6. Zhang, Cai Wen & Xie, Min & Goh, Thong Ngee, 2008. "Economic design of cumulative count of conforming charts under inspection by samples," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 93-104, January.
    7. Xiaobei Shen & Changliang Zou & Wei Jiang & Fugee Tsung, 2013. "Monitoring poisson count data with probability control limits when sample sizes are time varying," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(8), pages 625-636, December.
    8. Bock, David & Andersson, Eva & Frisén, Marianne, 2007. "Similarities and differences between statistical surveillance and certain decision rules in finance," Research Reports 2007:8, University of Gothenburg, Statistical Research Unit, School of Business, Economics and Law.
    9. Bianca Cox & Françoise Wuillaume & Herman Oyen & Sophie Maes, 2010. "Monitoring of all-cause mortality in Belgium (Be-MOMO): a new and automated system for the early detection and quantification of the mortality impact of public health events," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(4), pages 251-259, August.
    10. Bock, David, 2007. "Consequences of using the probability of a false alarm as the false alarm measure," Research Reports 2007:3, University of Gothenburg, Statistical Research Unit, School of Business, Economics and Law.
    11. Sotirios Bersimis & Athanasios Sachlas & Ross Sparks, 2017. "Performance Monitoring and Competence Assessment in Health Services," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1169-1190, December.
    12. Alexandre Rodrigues & Peter J. Diggle, 2012. "Bayesian Estimation and Prediction for Inhomogeneous Spatiotemporal Log-Gaussian Cox Processes Using Low-Rank Models, With Application to Criminal Surveillance," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(497), pages 93-101, March.
    13. Bersimis, Sotiris & Koutras, Markos V. & Maravelakis, Petros E., 2014. "A compound control chart for monitoring and controlling high quality processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 595-603.
    14. Ibrahim Musa & Hyun Woo Park & Lkhagvadorj Munkhdalai & Keun Ho Ryu, 2018. "Global Research on Syndromic Surveillance from 1993 to 2017: Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Axel Gandy & Jan Terje Kvaløy, 2013. "Guaranteed Conditional Performance of Control Charts via Bootstrap Methods," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 40(4), pages 647-668, December.
    16. Jianbo Li & Jiancheng Jiang & Xuejun Jiang & Lin Liu, 2018. "Risk-adjusted monitoring of surgical performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, August.
    17. Willem Albers, 2011. "Control charts for health care monitoring under overdispersion," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 67-83, July.
    18. Max Petzold & Christian Sonesson & Eva Bergman & Helle Kieler, 2004. "Surveillance in Longitudinal Models: Detection of Intrauterine Growth Restriction," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(4), pages 1025-1033, December.
    19. Isabel González & Ismael Sánchez, 2009. "On‐line evaluation of the stability of an inspection process," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 719-736, November.
    20. Michael Höhle, 2007. "$${\tt surveillance}$$ : An R package for the monitoring of infectious diseases," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 571-582, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:23:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10729-020-09514-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.