IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/copoec/v26y2015i4p442-454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analytic conservatism and analytic radicalism: Of understated distinctions and other analytical things

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Brooks

Abstract

I re-examine Brennan and Hamlin’s so-called convexity argument for analytic conservatism and Taylor’s counter-argument that a sufficiently strong exit option may provide a case for analytic radicalism. In doing so, I expose and underscore some of the implicit assumptions and understated distinctions that are present in some of the extant literature on analytic conservatism. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Brooks, 2015. "Analytic conservatism and analytic radicalism: Of understated distinctions and other analytical things," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 442-454, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:copoec:v:26:y:2015:i:4:p:442-454
    DOI: 10.1007/s10602-015-9191-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10602-015-9191-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10602-015-9191-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frederick H. Chen, 2010. "Expected Utility Illustrated: A Graphical Analysis of Gambles with More than Two Possible Outcomes," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 63-70, January.
    2. Geoffrey Brennan & Alan Hamlin, 2013. "Conservatism and radicalism," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 173-176, June.
    3. Brennan, Geoffrey & Hamlin, Alan, 2004. "Analytic Conservatism," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(4), pages 675-691, October.
    4. Geoffrey Brennan & Michael Brooks, 2013. "Buchanan on Freedom," Studies in Public Choice, in: Dwight R. Lee (ed.), Public Choice, Past and Present, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 43-64, Springer.
    5. Brad Taylor, 2013. "Analytic radicalism," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 166-172, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brad Taylor, 2013. "Analytic radicalism," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 166-172, June.
    2. Brennan Geoffrey, 2014. "Hayek’s Conservatism: The Possibility of a Conservative Liberal," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 65(1), pages 331-344, January.
    3. Geoffrey Brennan & Alan Hamlin, 2013. "Conservatism and radicalism," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 173-176, June.
    4. Brad R. Taylor, 2017. "The Lack of Competition in Governance as an Impediment to Regional Development in Australia," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 21-30.
    5. Robert Sugden, 2013. "Contractarianism as a Broad Church," Rationality, Markets and Morals, Frankfurt School Verlag, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, vol. 4(69), September.
    6. Keith Dowding, 2022. "Geoffrey Brennan: scholar and gentleman," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 193(3), pages 133-139, December.
    7. Daniele Bertolini, 2019. "Constitutionalizing Leviathan: A Critique of Buchanan’s Conception of Lawmaking," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 41-69, October.
    8. Geoffrey Brennan, 2015. "Buchanan’s anti-conservatism," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 7-13, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Analytic conservatism; Analytic radicalism; Idealism; Exit option; Risk preference; D02; D81;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:copoec:v:26:y:2015:i:4:p:442-454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.