IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v62y2023i3d10.1007_s10614-022-10294-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Importance Sampling for Calculating the Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall of the Quadratic Portfolio with t-Distributed Risk Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Huei-Wen Teng

    (National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University)

Abstract

In the banking industry, the calculation of regulatory capital by the Basel accords is directly related to the values of the Value-at-Risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES). The Monte Carlo simulation approach for calculating the VaR and ES is preferred, because it is able to incorporate a wide range of realistic models. Motivated by the gigantic size of the derivatives market, we consider the quadratic portfolio with t-distributed risk factors. To overcome the slow convergence of the Monte Carlo simulation approach, we propose a novel importance sampling scheme, which is applicable to the calculation of the VaR and ES. Numerical experiments confirm the superiority of our method in terms of substantial reduction in variance and computing time, particularly in calculating the ES.

Suggested Citation

  • Huei-Wen Teng, 2023. "Importance Sampling for Calculating the Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall of the Quadratic Portfolio with t-Distributed Risk Factors," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(3), pages 1125-1154, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:62:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10614-022-10294-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10614-022-10294-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10614-022-10294-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10614-022-10294-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Glasserman & Sandeep Juneja, 2008. "Uniformly Efficient Importance Sampling for the Tail Distribution of Sums of Random Variables," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 36-50, February.
    2. Huei-Wen Teng & Cheng-Der Fuh & Chun-Chieh Chen, 2016. "On an automatic and optimal importance sampling approach with applications in finance," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(8), pages 1259-1271, August.
    3. Cheng-Der Fuh & Inchi Hu & Ya-Hui Hsu & Ren-Her Wang, 2011. "Efficient Simulation of Value at Risk with Heavy-Tailed Risk Factors," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1395-1406, December.
    4. Athanassios N. Avramidis & James R. Wilson, 1998. "Correlation-Induction Techniques for Estimating Quantiles in Simulation Experiments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 574-591, August.
    5. Jason C. Hsu & Barry L. Nelson, 1990. "Control Variates for Quantile Estimation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(7), pages 835-851, July.
    6. Paul Glasserman & Jingyi Li, 2005. "Importance Sampling for Portfolio Credit Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(11), pages 1643-1656, November.
    7. R. Cont, 2001. "Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 223-236.
    8. Timothy C. Hesterberg & Barry L. Nelson, 1998. "Control Variates for Probability and Quantile Estimation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(9), pages 1295-1312, September.
    9. Paul Glasserman & Philip Heidelberger & Perwez Shahabuddin, 2000. "Variance Reduction Techniques for Estimating Value-at-Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(10), pages 1349-1364, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel N. Cohen & Christoph Reisinger & Sheng Wang, 2022. "Estimating risks of option books using neural-SDE market models," Papers 2202.07148, arXiv.org.
    2. L. Jeff Hong, 2009. "Estimating Quantile Sensitivities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 118-130, February.
    3. Hui Dong & Marvin K. Nakayama, 2017. "Quantile Estimation with Latin Hypercube Sampling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1678-1695, December.
    4. Chen, E. Jack & Kelton, W. David, 2006. "Quantile and tolerance-interval estimation in simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 520-540, January.
    5. Cheng-Der Fuh & Chuan-Ju Wang, 2017. "Efficient Exponential Tilting for Portfolio Credit Risk," Papers 1711.03744, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2019.
    6. Xing Jin & Michael C. Fu & Xiaoping Xiong, 2003. "Probabilistic Error Bounds for Simulation Quantile Estimators," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 230-246, February.
    7. Shih-Kuei Lin & Ren-Her Wang & Cheng-Der Fuh, 2006. "Risk Management for Linear and Non-Linear Assets: A Bootstrap Method with Importance Resampling to Evaluate Value-at-Risk," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 13(3), pages 261-295, September.
    8. Grundke, Peter, 2009. "Importance sampling for integrated market and credit portfolio models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 206-226, April.
    9. Rongda Chen & Ze Wang & Lean Yu, 2017. "Importance Sampling for Credit Portfolio Risk with Risk Factors Having t-Copula," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1101-1124, July.
    10. Athanassios N. Avramidis & James R. Wilson, 1998. "Correlation-Induction Techniques for Estimating Quantiles in Simulation Experiments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 574-591, August.
    11. Cheng-Der Fuh & Huei-Wen Teng & Ren-Her Wang, 2018. "Efficient Simulation of Value-at-Risk Under a Jump Diffusion Model: A New Method for Moderate Deviation Events," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 51(4), pages 973-990, April.
    12. Chaitra H. Nagaraja & Haikady N. Nagaraja, 2020. "Distribution‐free Approximate Methods for Constructing Confidence Intervals for Quantiles," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(1), pages 75-100, April.
    13. Erik Hintz & Marius Hofert & Christiane Lemieux & Yoshihiro Taniguchi, 2022. "Single-Index Importance Sampling with Stratification," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 3049-3073, December.
    14. Soumyadip Ghosh & Raghu Pasupathy, 2012. "C-NORTA: A Rejection Procedure for Sampling from the Tail of Bivariate NORTA Distributions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 295-310, May.
    15. Xing Jin & Allen X. Zhang, 2006. "Reclaiming Quasi-Monte Carlo Efficiency in Portfolio Value-at-Risk Simulation Through Fourier Transform," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 925-938, June.
    16. He, Zhijian, 2022. "Sensitivity estimation of conditional value at risk using randomized quasi-Monte Carlo," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 229-242.
    17. Karthyek R. A. Murthy & Sandeep Juneja & Jose Blanchet, 2012. "State-independent Importance Sampling for Random Walks with Regularly Varying Increments," Papers 1206.3390, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2014.
    18. Guangxin Jiang & L. Jeff Hong & Barry L. Nelson, 2020. "Online Risk Monitoring Using Offline Simulation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 356-375, April.
    19. Han, Chulwoo & Park, Frank C., 2022. "A geometric framework for covariance dynamics," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    20. Abduraimova, Kumushoy, 2022. "Contagion and tail risk in complex financial networks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:62:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10614-022-10294-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.