IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v56y2020i4d10.1007_s10614-019-09947-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fast Monte Carlo Simulation for Pricing Equity-Linked Securities

Author

Listed:
  • Hanbyeol Jang

    (Korea University)

  • Sangkwon Kim

    (Korea University)

  • Junhee Han

    (Korea University)

  • Seongjin Lee

    (Korea University)

  • Jungyup Ban

    (Korea University)

  • Hyunsoo Han

    (Korea University)

  • Chaeyoung Lee

    (Korea University)

  • Darae Jeong

    (Kangwon National University)

  • Junseok Kim

    (Korea University)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a fast Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) algorithm for pricing equity-linked securities (ELS). The ELS is one of the most popular and complex financial derivatives in South Korea. We consider a step-down ELS with a knock-in barrier. This derivative has several intermediate and final automatic redemptions when the underlying asset satisfies certain conditions. If these conditions are not satisfied until the expiry date, then it will be checked whether the stock path hits the knock-in barrier. The payoff is given depending on whether the path hits the knock-in barrier. In the proposed algorithm, we first generate a stock path for redemption dates only. If the generated stock path does not satisfy the early redemption conditions and is not below the knock-in barrier at the redemption dates, then we regenerate a daily path using Brownian bridge. We present numerical algorithms for one-, two-, and three-asset step-down ELS. The computational results demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed fast MCS algorithm. The proposed fast MCS approach is more than 20 times faster than the conventional standard MCS.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanbyeol Jang & Sangkwon Kim & Junhee Han & Seongjin Lee & Jungyup Ban & Hyunsoo Han & Chaeyoung Lee & Darae Jeong & Junseok Kim, 2020. "Fast Monte Carlo Simulation for Pricing Equity-Linked Securities," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 56(4), pages 865-882, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:56:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10614-019-09947-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10614-019-09947-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10614-019-09947-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10614-019-09947-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Darae Jeong & Minhyun Yoo & Junseok Kim, 2018. "Finite Difference Method for the Black–Scholes Equation Without Boundary Conditions," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 51(4), pages 961-972, April.
    2. Tsai, I-Chun, 2017. "The source of global stock market risk: A viewpoint of economic policy uncertainty," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 122-131.
    3. Boyle, Phelim P., 1977. "Options: A Monte Carlo approach," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 323-338, May.
    4. Fabozzi, Frank J. & Paletta, Tommaso & Tunaru, Radu, 2017. "An improved least squares Monte Carlo valuation method based on heteroscedasticity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 698-706.
    5. Boyle, Phelim & Broadie, Mark & Glasserman, Paul, 1997. "Monte Carlo methods for security pricing," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 21(8-9), pages 1267-1321, June.
    6. Shiraya, Kenichiro & Takahashi, Akihiko, 2017. "A general control variate method for multi-dimensional SDEs: An application to multi-asset options under local stochastic volatility with jumps models in finance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 358-371.
    7. Ghafarian, Bahareh & Hanafizadeh, Payam & Qahi, Amir Hossein Mortazavi, 2018. "Applying Greek letters to robust option price modeling by binomial-tree," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 632-639.
    8. R. Kalantari & S. Shahmorad, 2019. "A Stable and Convergent Finite Difference Method for Fractional Black–Scholes Model of American Put Option Pricing," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 191-205, January.
    9. Paolo Baldi & Lucia Caramellino & Maria Gabriella Iovino, 1999. "Pricing General Barrier Options: A Numerical Approach Using Sharp Large Deviations," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(4), pages 293-321, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cristian Mardones & Darling Silva, 2023. "Evaluation of Non-survey Methods for the Construction of Regional Input–Output Matrices When There is Partial Historical Information," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 1173-1205, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    2. Lu, Ziqiang & Zhu, Yuanguo & Li, Bo, 2019. "Critical value-based Asian option pricing model for uncertain financial markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 694-703.
    3. Darae Jeong & Minhyun Yoo & Changwoo Yoo & Junseok Kim, 2019. "A Hybrid Monte Carlo and Finite Difference Method for Option Pricing," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 111-124, January.
    4. Tak Kuen Siu & Robert J. Elliott, 2019. "Hedging Options In A Doubly Markov-Modulated Financial Market Via Stochastic Flows," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(08), pages 1-41, December.
    5. Nelson Areal & Artur Rodrigues & Manuel Armada, 2008. "On improving the least squares Monte Carlo option valuation method," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 119-151, March.
    6. John Board & Charles Sutcliffe & William T. Ziemba, 2003. "Applying Operations Research Techniques to Financial Markets," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 12-24, April.
    7. Manuel Moreno & Javier Navas, 2003. "On the Robustness of Least-Squares Monte Carlo (LSM) for Pricing American Derivatives," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 107-128, May.
    8. Cvitanic, Jaksa & Goukasian, Levon & Zapatero, Fernando, 2003. "Monte Carlo computation of optimal portfolios in complete markets," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 971-986, April.
    9. Tomáš Tichý, 2008. "Posouzení vybraných možností zefektivnění simulace Monte Carlo při opčním oceňování [Examination of selected improvement approaches to Monte Carlo simulation in option pricing]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(6), pages 772-794.
    10. Ömür Ugur, 2008. "An Introduction to Computational Finance," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number p556, February.
    11. Li, Hongshan & Huang, Zhongyi, 2020. "An iterative splitting method for pricing European options under the Heston model☆," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 387(C).
    12. Hongshan Li & Zhongyi Huang, 2020. "An iterative splitting method for pricing European options under the Heston model," Papers 2003.12934, arXiv.org.
    13. Zbigniew Palmowski & Tomasz Serafin, 2020. "Note on simulation pricing of $\pi$-options," Papers 2007.02076, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    14. Power, Gabriel J. & Burris, Mark & Vadali, Sharada & Vedenov, Dmitry, 2016. "Valuation of strategic options in public–private partnerships," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 50-68.
    15. Paul Bilokon & Sergei Kucherenko & Casey Williams, 2022. "Quasi-Monte Carlo methods for calculating derivatives sensitivities on the GPU," Papers 2209.11337, arXiv.org.
    16. Michael A. Kouritzin, 2018. "Explicit Heston Solutions And Stochastic Approximation For Path-Dependent Option Pricing," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-45, February.
    17. Faller, D. & Petruccione, F., 2003. "A master equation approach to option pricing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 519-534.
    18. Huang, Shih-Feng & Tu, Ya-Ting, 2014. "Asymptotic distribution of the EPMS estimator for financial derivatives pricing," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 129-145.
    19. Broadie, Mark & Glasserman, Paul, 1997. "Pricing American-style securities using simulation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 21(8-9), pages 1323-1352, June.
    20. Andrea Klimešová & Tomáš Václavík, 2016. "Gas Swing Options: Introduction and Pricing using Monte Carlo Methods," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(1), pages 15-32.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:56:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10614-019-09947-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.